Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31031975›Full record

ArticleMolecular and clinical oncology2019

Favorable long-term oncological and urinary outcomes of incidental prostate cancer following holmium laser enucleation of the prostate.

Yusuke Tominaga, Takuya Sadahira, Yosuke Mitsui, Yuki Maruyama, Ryuta Tanimoto, Koichiro Wada, Shuhei Munemasa, Nobuyuki Kusaka, Yasuhiro Nishiyama, Takushi Kurashige and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular and clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Rates of incidental prostate cancer following HoLEP Can it be predicted preoperatively?Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Yusuke TominagaDepartment of Urology, Tottori Municipal Hospital, Tottori, Tottori 680-0873, Japan.
Takuya SadahiraDepartment of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama, Okayama 700-8558, Japan.
Yosuke MitsuiDepartment of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama, Okayama 700-8558, Japan.
Yuki MaruyamaDepartment of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama, Okayama 700-8558, Japan.
Ryuta TanimotoDepartment of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama, Okayama 700-8558, Japan.
Koichiro WadaDepartment of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama, Okayama 700-8558, Japan.
Shuhei MunemasaDepartment of Urology, Tottori Municipal Hospital, Tottori, Tottori 680-0873, Japan.
Nobuyuki KusakaDepartment of Urology, Tottori Municipal Hospital, Tottori, Tottori 680-0873, Japan.
Yasuhiro NishiyamaDepartment of Urology, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi, Kochi 781-8555, Japan.
Takushi KurashigeDepartment of Immunology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Yasutomo NasuDepartment of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Science, Okayama, Okayama 700-8558, Japan.
Shunji HayataDepartment of Urology, Tottori Municipal Hospital, Tottori, Tottori 680-0873, Japan.
Okayama University · JPCleveland Clinic · USUniversity of Kochi · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of incidental prostate cancer (IPCa), which was diagnosed by holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), on long-term oncological and functional outcomes. A total of 482 patients who underwent HoLEP for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) between 2008 and 2016 at our institution were retrospectively reviewed. We defined IPCa as prostate cancer (PCa) according to the enucleated tissue of transitional zone. Therefore, 64 patients were excluded for the following reasons: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥4.0 ng/ml and no prostate biopsy (n=46); and PSA ≥4.0 ng/ml and diagnosed with PCa by prostate biopsy performed during HoLEP (n=18). Notably, 418 patients were included in the study and divided into two groups: The BPH group and the IPCa group. For 5 years, postoperative PSA and functional outcomes were evaluated. Of 418 patients, 25 (6%) were diagnosed with IPCa by HoLEP, 21 patients (84%) had a Gleason score ≤6 and 5 patients (20%) received adjuvant therapy for PCa following HoLEP. No significant differences were observed between groups for preoperative PSA, PSA density, or urinary and sexual function outcomes; however, age at the time of HoLEP significantly differed between groups (71.7 vs. 75.5 years, P=0.026). Long-term (5-year) urinary outcomes demonstrated sustained improvement. Postoperative PSA increased gradually in the IPCa group (3-year, P=0.033; 4-year, P=0.037); International Index of Erectile Function 5 conversely decreased (5-year, P=0.068). According to the present results, if standard PSA screening and prostate biopsy are performed, watchful waiting for IPCa is feasible, and IPCa does not impact on 5-year urinary outcomes.

Indexed as

benign prostatic hyperplasiaholmium laser enucleation of the prostateincidental prostate cancerlong-term outcomewatchful waiting

Identifiers

PMID31031975
PMCPMC6482390
OpenAlexW2936062848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.