ArticleEcology and evolution2019
Does body size predict the buzz-pollination frequencies used by bees?
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Measuring and modelling the structural dynamics of poricidal anthers: a mechatronic approach.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2026Article
- Flight and Floral Acoustic Signals for Bee Species Identification.Neotropical entomology · 2025Article
- Sonic-induced cellular vibrations unzip intertwined anther cone trichomes to trigger floral self-pollination and boost tomato fruit size.Horticulture research · 2025Article
- Toward a Functional Trait Approach to Bee Ecology.Ecology and evolution · 2024Review
- Towards acoustic monitoring of bees: wingbeat sounds are related to species and individual traits.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Harvesting pollen with vibrations: towards an integrative understanding of the proximate and ultimate reasons for buzz pollination.Annals of botany · 2024Review
- Anther cones increase pollen release in buzz-pollinated Solanum flowers.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2022Article
- Structural dynamics of real and modelledJournal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2022Article
- How and why do bees buzz? Implications for buzz pollination.Journal of experimental botany · 2022Review
- Examining the Role of Buzzing Time and Acoustics on Pollen Extraction ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Machine learning approach for automatic recognition of tomato-pollinating bees based on their buzzing-sounds.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Article
- Transmission of bee-like vibrations in buzz-pollinated plants with different stamen architectures.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Urbanization is associated with shifts in bumblebee body size, with cascading effects on pollination.Evolutionary applications · 2021Article
- Efficiency of using electric toothbrush as an alternative to a tuning fork for artificial buzz pollination is independent of instrument buzzing frequency.BMC ecology · 2020Article
- Does body size predict the buzz-pollination frequencies used by bees?Ecology and evolution · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Body size is an important trait linking pollinators and plants. Morphological matching between pollinators and plants is thought to reinforce pollinator fidelity, as the correct fit ensures that both parties benefit from the interaction. We investigated the influence of body size in a specialized pollination system (buzz-pollination) where bees vibrate flowers to release pollen concealed within poricidal stamens. Specifically, we explored how body size influences the frequency of buzz-pollination vibrations. Body size is expected to affect frequency as a result of the physical constraints it places on the indirect flight muscles that control the production of floral vibrations. Larger insects beat their wings less rapidly than smaller-bodied insects when flying, but whether similar scaling relationships exist with floral vibrations has not been widely explored. This is important because the amount of pollen ejected is determined by the frequency of the vibration and the displacement of a bee's thorax. We conducted a field study in three ecogeographic regions (alpine, desert, grassland) and recorded flight and floral vibrations from freely foraging bees from 27 species across four families. We found that floral vibration frequencies were significantly higher than flight frequencies, but never exceeded 400 Hz. Also, only flight frequencies were negatively correlated with body size. As a bee's size increased, its buzz ratio (floral frequency/flight frequency) increased such that only the largest bees were capable of generating floral vibration frequencies that exceeded double that of their flight vibrations. These results indicate size affects the capacity of bees to raise floral vibration frequencies substantially above flight frequencies. This may put smaller bees at a competitive disadvantage because even at the maximum floral vibration frequency of 400 Hz, their inability to achieve comparable thoracic displacements as larger bees would result in generating vibrations with lower amplitudes, and thus less total pollen ejected for the same foraging effort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.