Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31031919›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2019

Bacterial communities within

Mark A Szenteczki, Camille Pitteloud, Luca P Casacci, Lucie Kešnerová, Melissa R L Whitaker, Philipp Engel, Roger Vila, Nadir Alvarez

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Bacterial communities withinEcology and evolution · 2019
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Mark A SzenteczkiDepartment of Ecology and Evolution University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3049-8327
Camille PitteloudDepartment of Ecology and Evolution University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland.
Luca P CasacciMuseum and Institute of Zoology Polish Academy of Sciences Warsaw Poland.
Lucie KešnerováDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology University of Lausanne Switzerland.
Melissa R L WhitakerMuseum of Comparative Zoology Harvard University Cambridge Massachusetts.
Philipp EngelDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology University of Lausanne Switzerland.
Roger VilaInstitut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC-UPF) Barcelona Spain.
Nadir AlvarezDepartment of Ecology and Evolution University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland.
University of Lausanne · CHHarvard University · USInstitut de Biologia Evolutiva · ESMuseum and Institute of Zoology · PLNatural History Museum of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial symbionts are known to facilitate a wide range of physiological processes and ecological interactions for their hosts. In spite of this, caterpillars with highly diverse life histories appear to lack resident microbiota. Gut physiology, endogenous digestive enzymes, and limited social interactions may contribute to this pattern, but the consequences of shifts in social activity and diet on caterpillar microbiota are largely unknown.

Indexed as

16S amplicon sequencingbutterfliesLepidopteraLycaenidaemyrmecophilySpiroplasma

Identifiers

PMID31031919
PMCPMC6476763
OpenAlexW2932470661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.