ArticleEcology and evolution2019
Genetic structure, phylogeography, and demography of
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Establishment and characterisation of the first cell line from the giant Amazonian fish Arapaima gigas and its susceptibility to Tilapia Lake virus (TiLV).Fish physiology and biochemistry · 2026Article
- Health Status Assessment of Panamanian Pacific Coastal Areas Using Multi-Level Biomarkers in the Mangrove CockleToxics · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Population Genetic Structure ofEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- Genetic diversity of Anadara tuberculosa in two localities of the Colombian Pacific Coast.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Review
- Intraspecific mitochondrial gene variation can be as low as that of nuclear rRNA.F1000Research · 2020Article
- Genetic structure, phylogeography, and demography ofEcology and evolution · 2019Article
- Unexpected low genetic variation in the South American hystricognath rodent Lagostomus maximus (Rodentia: Chinchillidae).PloS one · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wild populations of the pustulose ark,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.