Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31031909›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2019

Sexual conflict in action: An antagonistic relationship between maternal and paternal sex allocation in the tammar wallaby,

Amy M Edwards, Elissa Z Cameron, Janine E Deakin, Tariq Ezaz, Jorge C Pereira, Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith, Kylie A Robert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Amy M EdwardsDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Evolution, School of Life Sciences La Trobe University Melbourne Victoria Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0005-4650
Elissa Z CameronSchool of Biological Sciences University of Canterbury Christchurch New Zealand.
Janine E DeakinInstitute for Applied Ecology University of Canberra Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia.
Tariq EzazInstitute for Applied Ecology University of Canberra Canberra Australian Capital Territory Australia.
Jorge C PereiraDepartment of Veterinary Medicine University of Cambridge Cambridge UK.
Malcolm A Ferguson-SmithDepartment of Veterinary Medicine University of Cambridge Cambridge UK.
Kylie A RobertDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Evolution, School of Life Sciences La Trobe University Melbourne Victoria Australia.
La Trobe University · AUUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Canberra · AUUniversity of Canterbury · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sex ratio biases are often inconsistent, both among and within species and populations. While some of these inconsistencies may be due to experimental design, much of the variation remains inexplicable. Recent research suggests that an exclusive focus on mothers may account for some of the inconsistency, with an increasing number of studies showing variation in sperm sex ratios and seminal fluids. Using fluorescent in-situ hybridization, we show a significant population-level Y-chromosome bias in the spermatozoa of wild tammar wallabies, but with significant intraindividual variation between males. We also show a population-level birth sex ratio trend in the same direction toward male offspring, but a weaning sex ratio that is significantly female-biased, indicating that males are disproportionately lost during lactation. We hypothesize that sexual conflict between parents may cause mothers to adjust offspring sex ratios after birth, through abandonment of male pouch young and reactivation of diapaused embryos. Further research is required in a captive, controlled setting to understand what is driving and mechanistically controlling sperm sex ratio and offspring sex ratio biases and to understand the sexually antagonistic relationship between mothers and fathers over offspring sex. These results extend beyond sex allocation, as they question studies of population processes that assume equal input of sex chromosomes from fathers, and will also assist with future reproduction studies for management and conservation of marsupials.

Indexed as

Macropus eugeniimaternaloffspring sex ratiopaternalsperm sex ratio

Identifiers

PMID31031909
PMCPMC6476839
OpenAlexW2934987049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.