Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31031778›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2019

Response Modifiers: Tweaking the Immune Response Against Influenza A Virus.

Husni Elbahesh, Thomas Gerlach, Giulietta Saletti, Guus F Rimmelzwaan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Influenza Vaccines: Successes and Continuing Challenges.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2021
    Article
  6. Influenza Therapeutics in Clinical Practice-Challenges and Recent Advances.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2021
    Review
  7. Development and Effects of Influenza Antiviral Drugs.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  8. Novel Fatty Acid inACS omega · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Husni ElbaheshResearch Center for Emerging Infections and Zoonoses, University of Veterinary Medicine (TiHo), Hanover, Germany.
Thomas GerlachResearch Center for Emerging Infections and Zoonoses, University of Veterinary Medicine (TiHo), Hanover, Germany.
Giulietta SalettiResearch Center for Emerging Infections and Zoonoses, University of Veterinary Medicine (TiHo), Hanover, Germany.
Guus F RimmelzwaanResearch Center for Emerging Infections and Zoonoses, University of Veterinary Medicine (TiHo), Hanover, Germany.
University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite causing pandemics and yearly epidemics that result in significant morbidity and mortality, our arsenal of options to treat influenza A virus (IAV) infections remains limited and is challenged by the virus itself. While vaccination is the preferred intervention strategy against influenza, its efficacy is reduced in the elderly and infants who are most susceptible to severe and/or fatal infections. In addition, antigenic variation of IAV complicates the production of efficacious vaccines. Similarly, effectiveness of currently used antiviral drugs is jeopardized by the development of resistance to these drugs. Like many viruses, IAV is reliant on host factors and signaling-pathways for its replication, which could potentially offer alternative options to treat infections. While host-factors have long been recognized as attractive therapeutic candidates against other viruses, only recently they have been targeted for development as IAV antivirals. Future strategies to combat IAV infections will most likely include approaches that alter host-virus interactions on the one hand or dampen harmful host immune responses on the other, with the use of biological response modifiers (BRMs). In principle, BRMs are biologically active agents including antibodies, small peptides, and/or other (small) molecules that can influence the immune response. BRMs are already being used in the clinic to treat malignancies and autoimmune diseases. Repurposing such agents would allow for accelerated use against severe and potentially fatal IAV infections. In this review, we will address the potential therapeutic use of different BRM classes to modulate the immune response induced after IAV infections.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntiviral AgentsHost-Pathogen InteractionsHumansImmunologic FactorsImmunomodulationInfluenza A virusInfluenza, HumanTreatment OutcomeAntiviral AgentsImmunologic Factorsantiviralimmune responseimmunomodulatorsinfluenzaresponse modifierstreatment

Identifiers

PMID31031778
PMCPMC6473099
OpenAlexW2938172963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.