Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31031751›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2019

Langerin

Ronald A Backer, Nathalie Diener, Björn E Clausen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Development and function of chicken XCR1Frontiers in immunology · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Posttranslational modifications by ADAM10 shape myeloid antigen-presenting cell homeostasis in the splenic marginal zone.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Regulation of the Migration of Distinct Dendritic Cell Subsets.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ronald A BackerPaul Klein Center for Immune Intervention, Institute for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.
Nathalie DienerPaul Klein Center for Immune Intervention, Institute for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.
Björn E ClausenPaul Klein Center for Immune Intervention, Institute for Molecular Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dendritic cells (DC) fulfill an essential sentinel function within the immune system, acting at the interface of innate and adaptive immunity. The DC family, both in mouse and man, shows high functional heterogeneity in order to orchestrate immune responses toward the immense variety of pathogens and other immunological threats. In this review, we focus on the Langerin

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigen PresentationAntigens, CDBiomarkersCD8 AntigensCell CommunicationCross-PrimingDendritic CellsDisease SusceptibilityGene Expression RegulationHumansImmunophenotypingImmunotherapyLectins, C-TypeMacrophagesMannose-Binding LectinsAntigens, CDBiomarkersCD207 protein, humanCD8 AntigensLectins, C-TypeMannose-Binding LectinsConventional dendritic cellscross-presentationdendritic cell subsetsimmunotherapymacrophagesmarginal zoneplasmacytoid dendritic cellsspleen

Identifiers

PMID31031751
PMCPMC6474365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.