Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31031738›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2019

Antimicrobial Usages and Antimicrobial Resistance in Commensal

Emilie Gay, Maxime Bour, Géraldine Cazeau, Nathalie Jarrige, Christophe Martineau, Jean-Yves Madec, Marisa Haenni

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Whole-Genome Sequencing of Human and PorcineAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Transmission of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) during animal transport.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. High Fecal Prevalence ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  16. Spread of theFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  17. Within-farm dynamics of ESBL-producingFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Drivers of ESBL-producingOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emilie GayUniversité de Lyon - ANSES, Laboratoire de Lyon, Unité Épidémiologie et Appui à la Surveillance, Lyon, France.
Maxime BourUniversité de Lyon - ANSES, Laboratoire de Lyon, Unité Antibiorésistance et Virulence Bactériennes, Lyon, France.
Géraldine CazeauUniversité de Lyon - ANSES, Laboratoire de Lyon, Unité Épidémiologie et Appui à la Surveillance, Lyon, France.
Nathalie JarrigeUniversité de Lyon - ANSES, Laboratoire de Lyon, Unité Épidémiologie et Appui à la Surveillance, Lyon, France.
Christophe MartineauIDELE, Service Qualité des Viandes, Le Rheu, France.
Jean-Yves MadecUniversité de Lyon - ANSES, Laboratoire de Lyon, Unité Antibiorésistance et Virulence Bactériennes, Lyon, France.
Marisa HaenniUniversité de Lyon - ANSES, Laboratoire de Lyon, Unité Antibiorésistance et Virulence Bactériennes, Lyon, France.
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon · FRInstitut de l’Elevage · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extended-Spectrum-Cephalosporin (ESC)-resistant Enterobacteriaceae have widely spread in all settings worldwide. In animals, Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) producers have been frequently identified in veal calves. The objectives of this study were to investigate the trends in the ESBL load and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) proportions, and antimicrobial usages (AMU) in veal calves during the fattening process. Ten fattening farms were selected and 50 animals per farm were sampled. AMR was assessed in bacteria from the dominant flora (collected on non-selective MacConckey agar) and in ESBL/AmpC-carrying bacteria from the subdominant flora (selected on ChromID ESBL selective plates) upon arrival and 5-6 months later before slaughter. The number and types of treatments during fattening were also collected. Rates of ESBL-producing

Indexed as

CTX-ME. coliESBLresistanceveal calves

Identifiers

PMID31031738
PMCPMC6473463
OpenAlexW2938574731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.