Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31031737›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2019

Knowledge on Antibiotic Use, Self-Reported Adherence to Antibiotic Intake, and Knowledge on Multi-Drug Resistant Pathogens - Results of a Population-Based Survey in Lower Saxony, Germany.

Heike Raupach-Rosin, Nicole Rübsamen, Gesa Schütte, Gabriele Raschpichler, Pa Saidou Chaw, Rafael Mikolajczyk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Medicinal Chemistry of Inhibitors Targeting Resistant Bacteria.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Heike Raupach-RosinResearch Group Epidemiological and Statistical Methods, Department of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany.
Nicole RübsamenResearch Group Epidemiological and Statistical Methods, Department of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany.
Gesa SchütteResearch Group Epidemiological and Statistical Methods, Department of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany.
Gabriele RaschpichlerResearch Group Epidemiological and Statistical Methods, Department of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany.
Pa Saidou ChawResearch Group Epidemiological and Statistical Methods, Department of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany.
Rafael MikolajczykResearch Group Epidemiological and Statistical Methods, Department of Epidemiology, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAssessment of public awareness on antibiotic use and resistance can identify key issues for campaigns addressing these problems. Our aim was to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practice (KAP) related to antibiotic use and multi-drug resistant (MDR) pathogens in a general population in Germany.

methodsWe conducted a KAP survey on antibiotics and on MDR pathogens using an online panel recruited from the general population, which was established using stratified random sampling from the population registry in four districts in Lower Saxony, Germany.

resultsIn the 12 months preceding the survey, 32.3% of the participants had received at least one prescription for antibiotics, 95.7% reported to follow the recommendations of prescribers, and 10.3% reported to stop taking antibiotics as soon as they feel better. Up to 94.9% of the participants had heard of MDR pathogens, 42.7% reported to know somebody who had been tested positive for it, 0.8% had an infection with it, and 37.2% were worried of contracting it. In case of contact with a carrier of MDR pathogens, over 90% would increase hand hygiene and 0.8% would avoid the carrier completely. Participants considered health care workers (75.1%) and everybody in society (87.8%) to be responsible for combating the spread of MDR pathogens.

conclusionThere is a high reported exposure to antibiotics and awareness of the problem of MDR pathogens. Despite personal worries, most of the participants indicated a reasonable, non-stigmatizing behavior toward carriers of MDR pathogens, and that every individual was responsible to avoid their spread.

Indexed as

adherenceantibiotic resistanceantibiotic usecomplianceMDR-pathogenspublic knowledge

Identifiers

PMID31031737
PMCPMC6473076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.