Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31031683›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2019

Validation of the Children's Eating Behavior Questionnaire in 5 and 6 Year-Old Children: The GUSTO Cohort Study.

Phaik Ling Quah, Lisa R Fries, Mei Jun Chan, Anna Fogel, Keri McCrickerd, Ai Ting Goh, Izzuddin M Aris, Yung Seng Lee, Wei Wei Pang, Iccha Basnyat and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Novel model of childhood appetitive traits in children with obesity.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2025
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Parental Feeding, Child Eating and Physical Activity: Differences in Children Living with and without Asthma.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Phaik Ling QuahSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Lisa R FriesNestlé Research, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mei Jun ChanSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Anna FogelClinical Nutrition Research Center, Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Keri McCrickerdClinical Nutrition Research Center, Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Ai Ting GohClinical Nutrition Research Center, Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Izzuddin M ArisSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Yung Seng LeeSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Wei Wei PangDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore - National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
Iccha BasnyatSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Hwee Lin WeeSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Fabian YapDepartment of Pediatrics, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Keith M GodfreyMedical Research Council Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, National Institute for Health Research Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, The University of Southampton, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Yap-Seng ChongSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Lynette P C ShekSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Kok Hian TanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Ciaran G FordeClinical Nutrition Research Center, Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Mary F F ChongSingapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore.
Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences · SGNational University Health System · SGAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SGKK Women's and Children's Hospital · SGNational University of Singapore · SGNational Institute for Health Research · GBNestlé (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

British Heart Foundation RG/15/17/31749Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Revised subscales of the Children's Eating Behavior Questionnaire (CEBQ) have been proposed to be more appropriate for assessing appetitive traits in Singaporean 3 year-olds, but the CEBQ has not yet been validated in older children in this population. The current study aimed to validate the CEBQ at ages 5 (

Indexed as

BMI z-scorechildren’s eating behaviorsconfirmatory factor analysisexploratory factor analysisgrowing up in Singapore toward healthy outcomes

Identifiers

PMID31031683
PMCPMC6470280
OpenAlexW2937567741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.