Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31031641›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2019

Why Do Birds Flock? A Role for Opioids in the Reinforcement of Gregarious Social Interactions.

Lauren V Riters, Cynthia A Kelm-Nelson, Jeremy A Spool

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren V RitersDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Cynthia A Kelm-NelsonDivision of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Jeremy A SpoolDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, United States.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst · US

Funding

Opioids and individual differences in social communicationR01MH080225 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI RITERS, LAUREN V · 2008 to 2017
$3.2M
Communication dysfunction in Parkinson disease: Integrated genetic and protein expression analysis of neural pathways to identify treatment targetsR21DC016135 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KELM-NELSON, CYNTHIA A · 2018 to 2020
$459k
NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC016135NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH080225
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The formation of social groups provides safety and opportunities for individuals to develop and practice important social skills. However, joining a social group does not result in any form of obvious, immediate reinforcement (e.g., it does not result in immediate copulation or a food reward), and individuals often remain in social groups despite agonistic responses from conspecifics. Much is known about neural and endocrine mechanisms underlying the motivation to perform mate- or offspring-directed behaviors. In contrast, relatively little is known about mechanisms underlying affiliative behaviors outside of these primary reproductive contexts. Studies on flocking behavior in songbirds are beginning to fill this knowledge gap. Here we review behavioral evidence that supports the hypothesis that non-sexual affiliative, flocking behaviors are both (1) rewarded by positive social interactions with conspecifics, and (2) reinforced because affiliative contact reduces a negative affective state caused by social isolation. We provide evidence from studies in European starlings,

Indexed as

affiliationmedial preoptic areamu opioid receptorsperiaqueductal grayreinforcementsocial cohesionsongbirdsventral tegmental area

Identifiers

PMID31031641
PMCPMC6473117
OpenAlexW2935868258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.