Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31031453›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental and experimental botany2015

Shifts in the elemental composition of plants during a very severe drought.

Ifigenia Urbina, Jordi Sardans, Carl Beierkuhnlein, Anke Jentsch, Sabrina Backhaus, Kerstin Grant, Juergen Kreyling, Josep Peñuelas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental and experimental botany, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Tolerance ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Integrating plant ecological responses to climate extremes from individual to ecosystem levels.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ifigenia UrbinaCSIC, Global Ecology Unit CREAF-CEAB-CSIC-UAB, 08913 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Catalonia, Spain.
Jordi SardansCSIC, Global Ecology Unit CREAF-CEAB-CSIC-UAB, 08913 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Catalonia, Spain.
Carl BeierkuhnleinBiogeography, BayCEER, University of Bayreuth, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany.
Anke JentschDisturbance Ecology, BayCEER, University of Bayreuth, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany.
Sabrina BackhausDisturbance Ecology, BayCEER, University of Bayreuth, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany.
Kerstin GrantDisturbance Ecology, BayCEER, University of Bayreuth, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany.
Juergen KreylingBiogeography, BayCEER, University of Bayreuth, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany.
Josep PeñuelasCSIC, Global Ecology Unit CREAF-CEAB-CSIC-UAB, 08913 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Catalonia, Spain.

Funding

European Research Council 610028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diverse plant functions (e.g. growth, storage, defense and anti-stress mechanisms) use elements disproportionally. We hypothesized that plants growing under different abiotic and biotic conditions would shift their elemental compositions in response to a very severe drought. We tested this hypothesis by investigating the changes in foliar stoichiometry and species composition from a very severe drought. We also tested the effects of previous droughts (acclimation) on this response. Different species growing in the same community responded more similarly to a very severe drought than did individual species growing in different communities. The stoichiometric shifts were thus more community-dependent than species-dependent. The results also suggested that plants grown in monoculture were less stoichiometrically plastic during the drought than plants grown in a more diverse community. Previous exposure to long-term drought treatments in the same communities did not significantly affect the stoichiometric shifts during the new drought. Differential use of resources may have been responsible for these responses. Monocultured plants, which used the same resources in similar proportions, had more difficulty avoiding direct competition when the resources became scarcer. Moreover, each species tested had a particular elemental composition in all communities and climatic treatments. The differences in foliar elemental compositions were largest between plant functional groups (shrubs and grasses) and smallest among species within the same functional group. Global principal components analyses (PCAs) identified a general tendency for all species, independently of the community in which they grew, toward lower concentrations of K, N, P, Mg and S, and to higher concentrations of C and Fe as the drought advanced. This study has demonstrated the utility of analyses of differences and shifts in plant elemental composition for understanding the processes underlying the responses of plants to changes in biotic and abiotic environmental conditions.

Indexed as

Biogeochemical nicheEcological stoichiometryelemental compositionextreme droughtnitrogenphosphorus

Identifiers

PMID31031453
PMCPMC6485511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.