Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31031419›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. Missouri Botanical Garden2015

Assessing the Fossil Record of Asterids in the Context of Our Current Phylogenetic Framework.

Steven R Manchester, Friðgeir Grímsson, Reinhard Zetter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. Missouri Botanical Garden, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The earliest large carpenter bee (Palaeobiodiversity and palaeoenvironments · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Plastome Phylogenomics ofFrontiers in genetics · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Laurasian migration explains Gondwanan disjunctions: evidence from Malpighiaceae.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2002
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Steven R ManchesterFlorida Museum of Natural History, Gainesville Florida, 32611-7800, USA.
Friðgeir GrímssonUniversity of Vienna, Department of Palaeontology, Althanstraße 14 (UZA II), A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
Reinhard ZetterUniversity of Vienna, Department of Palaeontology, Althanstraße 14 (UZA II), A-1090, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 24427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fossil record provides good evidence for the minimum ages of important events in the diversification and geographic spread of Asteridae, with earliest examples extending back to the Turonian stage of the Late Cretaceous (~89 Ma). Some of the fossil identifications accepted in previous considerations of asterid phylogeny do not stand up to careful scrutiny. Nevertheless, among major clades of asterids, there is good evidence for a range of useful anchor points. Here we provide a synopsis of fossil occurrences that we consider as reliable representatives of modern Asterid families and genera. In addition, we provide new examples documented by fossil dispersed pollen investigated by both light and scanning electron microscopy studies including representatives of Loranthaceae, Amaranthaceae, Cornaceae (incl.

Indexed as

AngiospermsAsteridaeCenozoicCretaceouspaleobotanypalynology

Identifiers

PMID31031419
PMCPMC6485501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.