Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31030598›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the American Heart Association2019

Sex- and Gender-Stratified Risks of Psychological Factors for Incident Ischemic Heart Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Veerle R Smaardijk, Paul Lodder, Willem J Kop, Bente van Gennep, Angela H E M Maas, Paula M C Mommersteeg

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Women.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Anxiety and hemodynamic reactivity during cardiac stress testing: The role of gender and age in myocardial ischemia.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Veerle R Smaardijk1 Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic diseases (CoRPS) Tilburg University Tilburg The Netherlands.
Paul Lodder1 Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic diseases (CoRPS) Tilburg University Tilburg The Netherlands.
Willem J Kop1 Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic diseases (CoRPS) Tilburg University Tilburg The Netherlands.
Bente van Gennep1 Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic diseases (CoRPS) Tilburg University Tilburg The Netherlands.
Angela H E M Maas3 Department of Cardiology Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen Nijmegen The Netherlands.
Paula M C Mommersteeg1 Department of Medical and Clinical Psychology Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic diseases (CoRPS) Tilburg University Tilburg The Netherlands.
Tilburg University · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Psychological factors are associated with an increased risk of developing ischemic heart disease ( IHD ). Women more often report psychological factors, and sex and gender differences are present in IHD . In this meta-analysis we examine the risks of psychological factors for IHD incidence in women and men. We hypothesize that a broad range of psychological factors are related to a higher risk for incident IHD , with a higher risk for women. Methods and Results PubMed, EMBASE , and Psyc INFO were searched for studies assessing the risk between psychological factors and incident IHD . Psychological factors included depression, anxiety or panic disorder, social support, hostility, anger, personality (type D), type A behavior pattern, posttraumatic stress disorder, and psychological distress. In the primary analyses, 62 studies (77 separate reports) that included 2 145 679 women and 3 119 879 men and reported confounder-adjusted hazard ratios or relative risks were included. Pooled effect confounder-adjusted estimates from random-effects models showed that psychological factors (all combined) were associated with incident IHD in women (hazard ratio: 1.22; 95% CI , 1.14-1.30) and men (hazard ratio: 1.25; 95% CI , 1.19-1.31). No sex and gender differences were found for these pooled effect estimates ( P=0.547). Conclusions Psychological factors are associated with incident IHD in both women and men, but no significant differences were observed between women and men. IHD is predominantly being studied as obstructive coronary artery disease, which is more prevalent in men. Data are needed on psychological predictors and other manifestations of IHD such as coronary microvascular disease, which is more common in women.

Indexed as

HostilityPsychological DistressSocial SupportAngerAnxiety DisordersDepressive DisorderFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMyocardial IschemiaPanic DisorderProportional Hazards ModelsSex FactorsStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticType A Personalitygenderincidenceischemic heart diseasemeta‐analysispsychology and behaviorsex

Identifiers

PMID31030598
PMCPMC6512085
OpenAlexW2943510366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.