Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31030493›Full record

ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2019

Impact of Coexisting Uterine Adenomyosis on the Survival Outcome of Patients with Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Sarana Boonlak, Apiwat Aue-Aungkul, Chumnan Kietpeerakool, Pilaiwan Kleebkaow, Bandit Chumworathayi, Sanguanchoke Luanratanakorn, Amornrat Temtanakitpaisan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Impact of adenomyosis on the prognosis of patients with endometrial cancer.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sarana BoonlakDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. Email: apiwat_ant@hotmail.com
Apiwat Aue-AungkulDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. Email: apiwat_ant@hotmail.com
Chumnan KietpeerakoolDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. Email: apiwat_ant@hotmail.com
Pilaiwan KleebkaowDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. Email: apiwat_ant@hotmail.com
Bandit ChumworathayiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. Email: apiwat_ant@hotmail.com
Sanguanchoke LuanratanakornDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. Email: apiwat_ant@hotmail.com
Amornrat TemtanakitpaisanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. Email: apiwat_ant@hotmail.com

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To determine the effects of uterine adenomyosis on endometrial cancerrecurrence rates. Methods: This retrospective cohort study reviewed all consecutive patients diagnosed with endometrial cancerwho underwent total hysterectomy-based surgical staging at Srinagarind Hospital between January, 2010 and January, 2016. The patientswere divided into two groups:a uterine adenomyosisgroup and a non-adenomyosis group. Patient demographics, type of surgery, histopathology, stage of endometrial cancer, adjuvant treatment, and survival outcomes were compared. Results: A total 350 patients were enrolled, with 132 (37.71%) in the adenomyosis group and 218 (62.29%) in the nonadenomyosis group. Deep myometrial invasion and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) were more commonly found among patients who had no adenomyosis compared to those with adenomyosis(52.8% vs 39.4%, P=0.02 and 53.2% vs. 38.6%, P=0.01). There were no significant differences in terms of five-year recurrence-free survival (HR=1.47; 95%CI 0.88-2.44) and five-year overall survival (HR=0.81; 95%CI 0.43-1.53) between the two comparison groups. Conclusion: Coexisting uterine adenomyosis in endometrial cancer wasassociated withdeep myometrial invasion and LVSI but did not have significant impact on survival.

Indexed as

AdenomyosisAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCombined Modality TherapyEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateUterine NeoplasmsadenomyosisEndometrial cancerfree survivaloverall survivalrecurrencerisk factor

Identifiers

PMID31030493
PMCPMC6948917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.