Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31030317›Full record

ReviewInsights into imaging2019

Management of uterine adenomyosis: current trends and uterine artery embolization as a potential alternative to hysterectomy.

Riham Dessouky, Sherif A Gamil, Mohamad Gamal Nada, Rola Mousa, Yasmine Libda

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insights into imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Adenomyosis - An Overview.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Current and Prospective Treatment of Adenomyosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Riham DessoukyRadiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Koliat Al Tob Street, Zagazig, 44519, Egypt. rihamdessouky@gmail.com.
Sherif A GamilRadiology Department, Al-Ahrar Teaching Hospital, Zagazig, Egypt.
Mohamad Gamal NadaRadiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Koliat Al Tob Street, Zagazig, 44519, Egypt.
Rola MousaRadiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Koliat Al Tob Street, Zagazig, 44519, Egypt.
Yasmine LibdaRadiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Koliat Al Tob Street, Zagazig, 44519, Egypt.
Zagazig University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adenomyosis is a challenging clinical condition that is commonly being diagnosed in women of reproductive age. To date, many aspects of the disease have not been fully understood, making management increasingly difficult. Over time, minimally invasive diagnostic and treatment methods have developed as more women desire uterine preservation for future fertility or to avoid major surgery. Several uterine-sparing treatment options are now available, including medication, hysteroscopic resection or ablation, conservative surgical methods, and high-intensity focused ultrasound each with its own risks and benefits. Uterine artery embolization is an established treatment option for uterine fibroids and has recently gained ground as a safe and cost-effective method for treatment of uterine adenomyosis with promising results. In this review, we discuss current trends in the management of uterine adenomyosis with a special focus on uterine artery embolization as an alternative to hysterectomy.

Indexed as

AdenomyosisHysterectomyUterine artery embolization

Identifiers

PMID31030317
PMCPMC6486932
OpenAlexW2945895791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.