ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2020
Parallel repulsive logic regression with biological adjacency.
Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of optimum combinations of media channels for approaching COVID-19 vaccine unsure and unwilling groups in Japan.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Logic regression, an extension of generalized linear models with Boolean combinations of binary variables as predictors, is a useful tool in exploring interactions among single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genome-wide association studies. However, since the search space defined by all possible combinations of SNPs, their complements, and logical operators in Boolean expressions can be exceedingly large in such studies, objective function optimization is slow and likely to be trapped in many local solutions, resulting in model over-fitting. We introduce a new search algorithm, parallel repulsive logic regression (PRLR), to efficiently estimate parameters of a logic regression to find a best model within the large space of SNP interactions by incorporating: (i) relevant biological adjacency matrix between SNPs to define similarity of estimation paths or trees, which are derived from physical SNP positions on chromosomes and/or memberships in biological gene pathways; and (ii) two repulsive forces to counter the similarity between and within estimation paths considered in parallel, which are introduced as penalty terms in the objective function. We compare our method's performance for identifying biologically-meaningful SNP interactions through simulations and with real genetic-epidemiological data. PRLR's detection-accuracy measures outperform existing approaches, especially in terms of positive predictive value and sensitivity for detecting SNP-SNP interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.