ArticleGut2019
A blood-based prognostic biomarker in IBD.
Article in Gut, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05186623 (Establishment of Prediction Model of Biologics and Small Molecular Agent for Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Using Longitudinal Data), which is not on this map. Cited by 106 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Establishment of Prediction Model of Biologics and Small Molecular Agent for Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Using Longitudinal Data
Who cites it
106 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 191 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Applications to Inflammatory Bowel Disease, with Practical Guidelines for Interpretation.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2022Pooled it
- A systematic review and functional bioinformatics analysis of genes associated with Crohn's disease identify more than 120 related genes.BMC genomics · 2022Pooled it
- Composite outcomes in observational studies of ulcerative colitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.United European gastroenterology journal · 2022Pooled it
- Prognostic tools for identification of high risk in people with Crohn's disease: systematic review and cost-effectiveness study.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2021Pooled it
- Predicting outcomes for Crohn's disease using a molecular biomarker: profile trial.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2022Trial
- Endoscopic Activity Prediction in Ulcerative Colitis Using Hemogram-Derived Inflammatory Indices: Impact of Azathioprine Use on Diagnostic Performance.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in inflammatory bowel disease: From current evidence, clinical translation, and the road to precision medicine.Chinese medical journal · 2026Review
- Neonatal enteral antibiotics reduce gut inflammation and delay systemic immune development in preterm pigs.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- Immune endotypes in tuberculosis: Keys to decoding disease complexity.Journal of internal medicine · 2026Review
- Analysis of the use of monoclonal antibodies in the treatment of Crohn's disease.Antibody therapeutics · 2026Review
- Systematic bibliometric and visualized analysis of global research trends, impact, emerging areas, and hotspots of artificial intelligence in personalized medicine.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Analysis of blood-based DNA methylation signatures of aging and disease progression in inflammatory bowel disease.Human genetics · 2025Article
- Assessment of PredictSURE IBD Assay in a Multinational Cohort of Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.United European gastroenterology journal · 2025Article
- How "Sure" Are We About Precision Medicine in IBD?United European gastroenterology journal · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Advancing Inflammatory Bowel Disease Management: Setting New Standards.Cancers · 2025Review
- Understanding the therapeutic toolkit for inflammatory bowel disease.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025Review
- Mitochondrial Dysfunction: Unraveling the Elusive Biology Behind Anti-TNF Response During Ulcerative Colitis.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2025Article
- Prospective Evaluation of the Prediction Score for a Mild Course of Crohn's Disease (PreMiCC) in Newly Diagnosed Patients With Crohn's Disease: The PROGNOS Study.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2025Observational
- Eleven Grand Challenges for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Genetics and Genomics.Inflammatory bowel diseases · 2025Review
- Digital biomarkers and artificial intelligence: a new frontier in personalized management of inflammatory bowel disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issuedCorrection:2019
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveWe have previously described a prognostic transcriptional signature in CD8 T cells that separates patients with IBD into two phenotypically distinct subgroups, termed IBD1 and IBD2. Here we sought to develop a blood-based test that could identify these subgroups without cell separation, and thus be suitable for clinical use in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC).
designPatients with active IBD were recruited before treatment. Transcriptomic analyses were performed on purified CD8 T cells and/or whole blood. Phenotype data were collected prospectively. IBD1/IBD2 patient subgroups were identified by consensus clustering of CD8 T cell transcriptomes. In a training cohort, machine learning was used to identify groups of genes ('classifiers') whose differential expression in whole blood recreated the IBD1/IBD2 subgroups. Genes from the best classifiers were quantitative (q)PCR optimised, and further machine learning was used to identify the optimal qPCR classifier, which was locked down for further testing. Independent validation was sought in separate cohorts of patients with CD (n=66) and UC (n=57).
resultsIn both validation cohorts, a 17-gene qPCR-based classifier stratified patients into two distinct subgroups. Irrespective of the underlying diagnosis, IBDhi patients (analogous to the poor prognosis IBD1 subgroup) experienced significantly more aggressive disease than IBDlo patients (analogous to IBD2), with earlier need for treatment escalation (hazard ratio=2.65 (CD), 3.12 (UC)) and more escalations over time (for multiple escalations within 18 months: sensitivity=72.7% (CD), 100% (UC); negative predictive value=90.9% (CD), 100% (UC)).
conclusionThis is the first validated prognostic biomarker that can predict prognosis in newly diagnosed patients with IBD and represents a step towards personalised therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.