Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31030101›Full record

ArticleTranslational oncology2019

Comparison of T790M Acquisition Between Patients Treated with Afatinib and Gefitinib as First-Line Therapy: Retrospective Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Byung Woo Yoon, Jae Hoon Kim, Seung Hyeon Lee, Chang-Min Choi, Jin Kyung Rho, Shinkyo Yoon, Dae Ho Lee, Sang-We Kim, Tae-Won Jang, Jae Cheol Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Dynamic Assessment of Tissue and PlasmaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Byung Woo YoonDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jae Hoon KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
Seung Hyeon LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chang-Min ChoiDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jin Kyung RhoDepartment of Convergence Medicine, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Shinkyo YoonDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dae Ho LeeDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sang-We KimDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Tae-Won JangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: jangtw22@hanmail.net.
Jae Cheol LeeDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Ulsan, Seoul, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: jclee@amc.seoul.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Afatinib, a second-generation, irreversible pan-HER inhibitor, shows better suppression of T790M-positive lung cancer cells than gefitinib in preclinical studies. However, whether the effect of afatinib on T790M acquisition differs from that of gefitinib when used clinically as first-line therapy remains unclear. To reaffirm the preclinical efficacy of afatinib on T790M-positive lung cancer cells, H1975 cells and established PC-9 cells resistant to gefitinib and erlotinib by T790M were used. In total, 398 patients with second biopsy at progression with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutation, treated with afatinib or gefitinib as first-line therapy, were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching was used to balance covariates. Afatinib inhibited the growth of lung cancer cells with low T790M allele frequencies, which are resistant to gefitinib, but not those with high T790M allele frequencies. Afatinib and gefitinib showed similar efficacy in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) (11.5 vs 13.4 months, P = .08) and overall survival (OS) (29.3 vs 28.5 months, P = .76). T790M patients had better PFS and OS than those without T790M. There was no significant difference in the cumulative T790M acquisition ratio over time between afatinib and gefitinib (48.8% vs 59.3%, P = .317). The median time to acquire T790M was 12.9 months for afatinib and 15.7 months for gefitinib (P = .342). Although afatinib inhibited the growth of lung cancer cells with low T790M allele frequencies in preclinical studies, this could not be translated into clinical efficacy in terms of lowering the rate or delaying the time of T790M acquisition.

Identifiers

PMID31030101
PMCPMC6484288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.