Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31030008›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2019

Moral discourse in general practitioners' accounts of obesity communication.

Maxine Blackburn, Afroditi Stathi

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Changing the global obesity narrative to recognize and reduce weight stigma: A position statement from the World Obesity Federation.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Yonder: Obesity communication, opioid deprescribing, actinic keratosis, and artificial intelligence.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maxine BlackburnUniversity of Bath, Department for Health, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK; University of Edinburgh, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, UK. Electronic address: Maxineblackburn@gmx.com.
Afroditi StathiUniversity of Bath, Department for Health, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK; University of Birmingham, School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. Electronic address: A.Stathi@bham.ac.uk.
University of Birmingham · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obesity is not addressed with a large proportion of patients presenting in general practice. An increasing body of evidence suggests that health professionals view body weight as a sensitive topic to include in routine consultations and face barriers in initiating weight loss discussions. This study examined the discursive power relations that shape how general practitioners (GPs) understand and talk about obesity using a novel methodology to elicit responses from GPs about raising the topic of weight. Twenty GPs from the South West of England reflected upon novel trigger films simulating doctor-patient interactions, in which a doctor either acknowledged or ignored their patient's body weight. Underpinned by a discourse analytic approach, our findings suggest that GPs both reproduce and resist moral discourse surrounding body weight. They construct obesity as an individual behavioural problem whilst simultaneously drawing on socio-cultural discourse which positions body weight as central to social identity, situating obesity within a context of stigma and positioning patients as powerless to lose weight. Our findings highlight a need for increased reflexivity about competing discursive frameworks at play during medical consultations about obesity, which we suggest, contribute to increased tension and powerlessness for GPs. Trigger films are an innovative method to elicit information and discuss competing discourses.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCommunicationPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultEnglandFemaleGeneral PractitionersHumansMaleObesityPrimary Health CareWeight LossYoung AdultCritical public healthDiscourse analysisGeneral practitionersObesityStigma

Identifiers

PMID31030008
OpenAlexW2924324026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.