ArticleEating behaviors2019
A longitudinal investigation of perceived weight status as a mediator of sexual orientation disparities in maladaptive eating behaviors.
Article in Eating behaviors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Social, Behavioral, and Psychological Predictors of Young Women's Food Choices: A Scoping Review.Nutrients · 2025Article
- Daily Relationship Functioning and Disordered Eating Behaviors Among Sexual Minority Women in Same-Sex Relationships.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2024Article
- Gender-Affirming Nutrition: An Overview of Eating Disorders in the Transgender Population.Current nutrition reports · 2023Review
- Association Between the Patterns of Five Unhealthy Behaviors and Suicidal Behaviors Among Adolescents in Six Provinces of China.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Eating disorders and disordered eating behaviors in the LGBT population: a review of the literature.Journal of eating disorders · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Sexual minority adolescents are more likely than heterosexual peers to engage in maladaptive eating behaviors such as restrictive dieting. However, prior studies relied on cross-sectional data and did not test potential mechanisms. This study examined longitudinal associations between adolescent sexual minority status and three maladaptive eating behaviors (restrictive dieting, diet pill use, and drug-related dieting) in young adulthood and tested higher perceived weight status as a mediator of observed disparities. Data were drawn from Waves 2 (11th grade in 2010/2011) to 7 (4 years post high school in 2015/2016) of the NEXT Generation Health Study, a U.S. national longitudinal cohort of adolescents (n = 1925). Logistic regression analyses revealed that, relative to heterosexual females, sexual minority females were more likely to report any restrictive dieting (extreme food intake restriction) in the past year (62.9% vs. 37.0%; Adjusted Odds Ratio = 2.26, 95% CI = 1.07, 4.76). Associations between sexual minority status and diet pills use or drug-related dieting were not found. Results from structural equation modeling indicated that higher perceived weight status was a significant mediator of the association between sexual minority status and restrictive dieting among females. These findings highlight higher perceived weight status as an important cognitive mechanism explaining why sexual minority females are at heightened risk for restrictive dieting in young adulthood. To optimally inform prevention efforts, additional research is needed to test the extent to which minority stressors may shape weight perceptions and their contribution to maladaptive and disordered eating behaviors among sexual minority adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.