Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31029878›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2019

Self-administration of edible Δ

Michael P Smoker, Ken Mackie, Christopher C Lapish, Stephen L Boehm

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Differential disruption of response alternation by precipitated ΔPharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Nicotine Enhances Intravenous Self-administration of Cannabinoids in Adult Rats.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Dopamine, behavior, and addiction.Journal of biomedical science · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Sex differences and the endocannabinoid system in pain.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael P SmokerDepartment of Psychology and Indiana Alcohol Research Center, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. Electronic address: msmoker@iupui.edu.
Ken MackieDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences and the Gill Center, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.
Christopher C LapishDepartment of Psychology and Indiana Alcohol Research Center, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Stephen L BoehmDepartment of Psychology and Indiana Alcohol Research Center, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA.
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University Bloomington · US

Funding

RAT RESEARCH COMPONENTP50AA007611 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI CHRISTIAN, JOE C · 1987 to 2002
$5.3M
Cannabinoid Modulation of Cell FunctionK05DA021696 · NIDA · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI MACKIE, KENNETH · 2007 to 2017
$1.3M
NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA007611NIDA NIH HHS K05 DA021696
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith increasing access to legal cannabis across the globe, it is imperative to more closely study its behavioral and physiological effects. Furthermore, with the proliferation of cannabis use, modes of consumption are changing, with edible formulations becoming increasingly popular. Nevertheless, there are relatively few animal models of self-administration of the primary psychoactive component of cannabis, Δ

methodsMice were given limited access to a palatable dough which occasionally contained THC in doses ranging from 1 to 10 mg/kg. Following dough consumption, mice were assessed for home cage locomotor activity, body temperature, or analgesia. Locomotor activity was also assessed in conjunction with the CB1 receptor antagonist SR141716A.

resultsDough was well-consumed, but consumption decreased at the highest THC concentrations. Edible THC produced dose-dependent decreases in locomotor activity and body temperature in both sexes, and these effects were more pronounced in male mice. Hypolocomotion induced by edible THC was attenuated by SR141716A, indicating mediation by CB1 receptor activation.

conclusionsIn contrast to other cannabinoid self-administration models, edible THC is relatively low in stress and uses a route of administration analogous to one used by humans. Potential applications include chronic THC self-administration, determining THC reward/reinforcement, and investigating consequences of oral THC use.

Indexed as

RewardAnimalsBody TemperatureCannabinoidsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDronabinolFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMotor ActivityPsychotropic DrugsReceptor, Cannabinoid, CB1Self AdministrationCannabinoidsDronabinolPsychotropic DrugsReceptor, Cannabinoid, CB1CannabinoidEdibleOralSelf-administrationSex differenceΔ(9)-Tetrahydrocannabinol

Identifiers

PMID31029878
PMCPMC7158699
OpenAlexW2938560014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.