Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31029728›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2019

Decreases in Cued Reward Seeking After Reward-Paired Inhibition of Mesolimbic Dopamine.

Sarah Fischbach, Patricia H Janak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Superior Colliculus Projections Drive Dopamine Neuron Activity and Movement But Not Value.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Nucleus accumbens D1-receptors regulate and focus transitions to reward-seeking action.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarah FischbachNeuroscience Graduate Program, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA.
Patricia H JanakDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Krieger School of Arts and Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA; The Solomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA; Kavli Neuroscience Discovery Institute, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205. Electronic address: patricia.janak@jhu.edu.

Funding

Optogenetic Testing of Mechanims of Dopamine Action in Pavlovian LearningR01DA035943 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI JANAK, PATRICIA H. · 2014 to 2023
$4.1M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA035943
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reward-paired optogenetic manipulation of dopamine neurons can increase or decrease behavioral responding to antecedent cues when subjects have the opportunity for new learning, in accordance with a dopamine-mediated error learning signal. Here we examined the impact of reward-paired dopamine neuron inhibition on behavioral responding to reward-predictive cues after subjects had learned. We trained male TH-IRES-Cre mice to lever press for food reward in a progressive ratio procedure, a 2-cue choice procedure, or when continuously reinforced; in all procedures, completion of the response requirement was signaled by an auditory cue presented prior to food delivery. After training, mice underwent successive sessions in which optogenetic inhibition of dopamine neurons was triggered during food receipt. Rather than mimic brief inhibitions associated with negative reward prediction errors, we applied inhibition throughout the ingestion period on each trial. We found in all procedures that optogenetic inhibition of dopamine neurons during reward receipt decreased behavioral responding to the preceding reward-predictive cue over days, a behavioral change observed during time periods without optogenetic neuronal inhibition. Extinction-like behavioral responding was selective for learned associations: it was observed in the 2-cue choice procedure in which each subject was trained on two associations and inhibition was paired with reward for only one of the associations. Thus, inhibition during reward receipt can decrease responding to reward-predictive cues, sharing some features of behavioral extinction. These findings suggest changes in mesolimbic dopaminergic transmission at the time of experienced reward impacts subsequent responding to cues in well-trained subjects as predicted for a learning signal.

Indexed as

RewardAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAssociation LearningConditioning, OperantCuesDopaminergic NeuronsMaleMiceMotivationOptogeneticsVentral Tegmental AreaextinctionoptogeneticsPavlovian learningreward prediction errorTh-cre miceventral tegmental area

Identifiers

PMID31029728
PMCPMC6858844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.