ArticleNeuroscience2019
Decreases in Cued Reward Seeking After Reward-Paired Inhibition of Mesolimbic Dopamine.
Article in Neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Superior Colliculus Projections Drive Dopamine Neuron Activity and Movement But Not Value.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- VTA dopamine neuron activity produces spatially organized value representations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Superior colliculus projections drive dopamine neuron activity and movement but not value.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Aberrant neural computation of social controllability in nicotine-dependent humans.Communications biology · 2024Article
- Frontostriatal circuit dysfunction leads to cognitive inflexibility in neuroligin-3 R451C knockin mice.Molecular psychiatry · 2024Article
- Article
- Aberrant neural computation of social controllability in nicotine-dependent humans.Research square · 2024Article
- Temporal Dynamics Underlying Prelimbic Prefrontal Cortical Regulation of Action Selection and Outcome Evaluation during Risk/Reward Decision-Making.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- Nucleus accumbens D1-receptors regulate and focus transitions to reward-seeking action.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022Article
- Dopamine signals as temporal difference errors: recent advances.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2021Review
- Cocaine experience abolishes the motivation suppressing effect of CRF in the ventral midbrain.Addiction biology · 2021Article
- Nucleus accumbens shell dopamine mediates outcome value, but not predicted value, in a magnitude decision-making task.The European journal of neuroscience · 2020Article
- Opposite Consequences of Tonic and Phasic Increases in Accumbal Dopamine on Alcohol-Seeking Behavior.iScience · 2020Article
- Temporally restricted dopaminergic control of reward-conditioned movements.Nature neuroscience · 2020Article
- When does midbrain dopamine activity exert its effects on behavior?Nature neuroscience · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reward-paired optogenetic manipulation of dopamine neurons can increase or decrease behavioral responding to antecedent cues when subjects have the opportunity for new learning, in accordance with a dopamine-mediated error learning signal. Here we examined the impact of reward-paired dopamine neuron inhibition on behavioral responding to reward-predictive cues after subjects had learned. We trained male TH-IRES-Cre mice to lever press for food reward in a progressive ratio procedure, a 2-cue choice procedure, or when continuously reinforced; in all procedures, completion of the response requirement was signaled by an auditory cue presented prior to food delivery. After training, mice underwent successive sessions in which optogenetic inhibition of dopamine neurons was triggered during food receipt. Rather than mimic brief inhibitions associated with negative reward prediction errors, we applied inhibition throughout the ingestion period on each trial. We found in all procedures that optogenetic inhibition of dopamine neurons during reward receipt decreased behavioral responding to the preceding reward-predictive cue over days, a behavioral change observed during time periods without optogenetic neuronal inhibition. Extinction-like behavioral responding was selective for learned associations: it was observed in the 2-cue choice procedure in which each subject was trained on two associations and inhibition was paired with reward for only one of the associations. Thus, inhibition during reward receipt can decrease responding to reward-predictive cues, sharing some features of behavioral extinction. These findings suggest changes in mesolimbic dopaminergic transmission at the time of experienced reward impacts subsequent responding to cues in well-trained subjects as predicted for a learning signal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.