ArticleBMC cancer2019
Targeted capture-based NGS is superior to multiplex PCR-based NGS for hereditary BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene analysis in FFPE tumor samples.
Article in BMC cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transcriptome and resequencing reveal immune-related genes and molecular markers associated with Aeromonas salmonicida resistance in Salmo trutta fario.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Homologous recombination repair and breast cancer gene testing in prostate cancer: expert perspectives and practical guidance on best practice from sample acquisition to biomarker-informed clinical decision-making.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- MET Exon 14 Skipping Mutation in NSCLC: From Genomic Discovery to Biomarker-Guided Therapeutic Innovation.Current drug targets · 2026Review
- Article
- Article
- Homologous Recombination Deficiency Score Determined by Genomic Instability in a Romanian Cohort.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Comparative Analysis of Library Preparation Approaches for SARS-CoV-2 Genome Sequencing on the Illumina MiSeq Platform.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Comparison of Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Between Local and Central Laboratories in Korea.Annals of laboratory medicine · 2023Article
- Challenges in next generation sequencing of homology recombination repair genomic variants in prostate cancer: A nationwide survey and calibration project in China.Prostate international · 2022Article
- Target Enrichment Approaches for Next-Generation Sequencing Applications in Oncology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Graphene-Oxide and Ionic Liquid Modified Electrodes for Electrochemical Sensing of Breast Cancer 1 Gene.Biosensors · 2022Article
- Target capture sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 genomes using the ONETest Coronaviruses Plus.Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease · 2021Article
- Proteome profiling of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded lung adenocarcinoma tissues using a tandem mass tag-based quantitative proteomics approach.Oncology letters · 2021Article
- Whole genome sequencing of low input circulating cell-free DNA obtained from normal human subjects.Physiological reports · 2021Article
- Ultrasensitive detection of tumor-specific mutations in saliva of patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma.Cancer · 2021Article
- Tumor and germline next generation sequencing in high grade serous cancer: experience from a large population-based testing program.Molecular oncology · 2021Article
- Oligonucleotide capture sequencing of the SARS-CoV-2 genome and subgenomic fragments from COVID-19 individuals.PloS one · 2021Article
- Oligonucleotide Capture Sequencing of the SARS-CoV-2 Genome and Subgenomic Fragments from COVID-19 Individuals.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2020Article
- Oligonucleotide capture sequencing of the SARS-CoV-2 genome and subgenomic fragments from COVID-19 individuals.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2020Article
- Germline and SomaticFrontiers in oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith the introduction of Olaparib treatment for BRCA-deficient recurrent ovarian cancer, testing for somatic and/or germline mutations in BRCA1/2 genes in tumor tissues became essential for treatment decisions. In most cases only formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples, containing fragmented and chemically modified DNA of minor quality, are available. Thus, multiplex PCR-based sequencing is most commonly applied in routine molecular testing, which is predominantly focused on the identification of known hot spot mutations in oncogenes.
methodsWe compared the overall performance of an adjusted targeted capture-based enrichment protocol and a multiplex PCR-based approach for calling of pathogenic SNVs and InDels using DNA extracted from 13 FFPE tissue samples. We further applied both strategies to seven blood samples and five matched FFPE tumor tissues of patients with known germline exon-spanning deletions and gene-wide duplications in BRCA1/2 to evaluate CNV detection based solely on panel NGS data. Finally, we analyzed DNA from FFPE tissues of 11 index patients from families suspected of having hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, of whom no blood samples were available for testing, in order to identify underlying pathogenic germline BRCA1/2 mutations.
resultsThe multiplex PCR-based protocol produced inhomogeneous coverage among targets of each sample and between samples as well as sporadic amplicon drop out, leading to insufficiently or non-covered nucleotides, which subsequently hindered variant detection. This protocol further led to detection of PCR-artifacts that could easily have been misinterpreted as pathogenic mutations. No such limitations were observed by application of an adjusted targeted capture-based protocol, which allowed for CNV calling with 86% sensitivity and 100% specificity. All pathogenic CNVs were confirmed in the five matched FFPE tumor samples from patients carrying known pathogenic germline mutations and we additionally identified somatic loss of the second allele in BRCA1/2. Furthermore we detected pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants in four the eleven FFPE samples from patients of whom no blood was available for analysis.
conclusionsWe demonstrate that an adjusted targeted capture-based enrichment protocol is superior to commonly applied multiplex PCR-based protocols for reliable BRCA1/2 variant detection, including CNV-detection, using FFPE tumor samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.