Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31029130›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2019

An open access medical knowledge base for community driven diagnostic decision support system development.

Lars Müller, Rashmi Gangadharaiah, Simone C Klein, James Perry, Greg Bernstein, David Nurkse, Dustin Wailes, Rishi Graham, Robert El-Kareh, Sanjay Mehta and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. HTNpedia: A Knowledge Base for Hypertension Research.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2024
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The use of SNOMED CT, 2013-2020: a literature review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lars MüllerDesign Lab, UCSD, San Diego, CA, USA.
Rashmi GangadharaiahAmazon Web Services, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Simone C KleinSchool of Medicine, UCSD, San Diego, CA, USA.
James PerrySchool of Medicine, UCSD, San Diego, CA, USA.
Greg BernsteinSchool of Medicine, UCSD, San Diego, CA, USA.
David NurkseSchool of Medicine, UCSD, San Diego, CA, USA.
Dustin WailesSchool of Medicine, UCSD, San Diego, CA, USA.
Rishi GrahamDesign Lab, UCSD, San Diego, CA, USA.
Robert El-KarehDivision of Biomedical Informatics, UCSD, San Diego, CA, USA.
Sanjay MehtaDivision of Infectious Diseases, UCSD, San Diego, CA, USA.
Staal A VinterboDepartment of Information Security and Communication Technology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Eliah Aronoff-SpencerDesign Lab, UCSD, San Diego, CA, USA. earonoffspencer@ucsd.edu.

Funding

The Universidade Eduardo Mondlane/UCSD Medical Education PartnershipR24TW008910 · FIC · EDUARDO MONDLANE UNIVERSITY · PI BICKLER, STEPHEN W, NOORMAHOMED, EMILIA VIRGINIA · 2010 to 2014
$2.0M
Global Health Knowledge Collective: A Collaborative Toolkit for Global HealthR24TW008805 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI OHNO-MACHADO, LUCILA · 2010 to 2010
$248k
FIC NIH HHS R24 TW008805FIC NIH HHS R24 TW008910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWhile early diagnostic decision support systems were built around knowledge bases, more recent systems employ machine learning to consume large amounts of health data. We argue curated knowledge bases will remain an important component of future diagnostic decision support systems by providing ground truth and facilitating explainable human-computer interaction, but that prototype development is hampered by the lack of freely available computable knowledge bases.

methodsWe constructed an open access knowledge base and evaluated its potential in the context of a prototype decision support system. We developed a modified set-covering algorithm to benchmark the performance of our knowledge base compared to existing platforms. Testing was based on case reports from selected literature and medical student preparatory material.

resultsThe knowledge base contains over 2000 ICD-10 coded diseases and 450 RX-Norm coded medications, with over 8000 unique observations encoded as SNOMED or LOINC semantic terms. Using 117 medical cases, we found the accuracy of the knowledge base and test algorithm to be comparable to established diagnostic tools such as Isabel and DXplain. Our prototype, as well as DXplain, showed the correct answer as "best suggestion" in 33% of the cases. While we identified shortcomings during development and evaluation, we found the knowledge base to be a promising platform for decision support systems.

conclusionWe built and successfully evaluated an open access knowledge base to facilitate the development of new medical diagnostic assistants. This knowledge base can be expanded and curated by users and serve as a starting point to facilitate new technology development and system improvement in many contexts.

Indexed as

Access to InformationDecision Support Systems, ClinicalKnowledge BasesExpert SystemsHumansInternational Classification of DiseasesMachine LearningSemanticsSoftwareVocabulary, ControlledDecision support systems, clinical (D020000)Diagnosis, differential (D003937)Knowledge bases (D051188)

Identifiers

PMID31029130
PMCPMC6486985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.