Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31029102›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2019

A genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism and copy number variation analysis for number of piglets born alive.

Nedenia Bonvino Stafuzza, Rafael Medeiros de Oliveira Silva, Breno de Oliveira Fragomeni, Yutaka Masuda, Yijian Huang, Kent Gray, Daniela A Lino Lourenco

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
22.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genome-wide characterization of copy number variations in Nagami Mithun (Bos frontalis) using whole-genome resequencing.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nedenia Bonvino StafuzzaDepartment of Exact Science, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences (FCAV), Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, SP, 14884-900, Brazil. nedeniabs@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6432-2330
Rafael Medeiros de Oliveira SilvaDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Breno de Oliveira FragomeniDepartment of Animal Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs-Mansfield, CT, USA.
Yutaka MasudaDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Yijian HuangSmithfield Premium Genetics Group, Rose Hill, NC, USA.
Kent GraySmithfield Premium Genetics Group, Rose Hill, NC, USA.
Daniela A Lino LourencoDepartment of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
University of Georgia · USUniversity of Connecticut · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this study we integrated the CNV (copy number variation) and WssGWAS (weighted single-step approach for genome-wide association) analyses to increase the knowledge about number of piglets born alive, an economically important reproductive trait with significant impact on production efficiency of pigs.

resultsA total of 3892 samples were genotyped with the Porcine SNP80 BeadChip. After quality control, a total of 57,962 high-quality SNPs from 3520 Duroc pigs were retained. The PennCNV algorithm identified 46,118 CNVs, which were aggregated by overlapping in 425 CNV regions (CNVRs) ranging from 2.5 Kb to 9718.4 Kb and covering 197 Mb (~ 7.01%) of the pig autosomal genome. The WssGWAS identified 16 genomic regions explaining more than 1% of the additive genetic variance for number of piglets born alive. The overlap between CNVR and WssGWAS analyses identified common regions on SSC2 (4.2-5.2 Mb), SSC3 (3.9-4.9 Mb), SSC12 (56.6-57.6 Mb), and SSC17 (17.3-18.3 Mb). Those regions are known for harboring important causative variants for pig reproductive traits based on their crucial functions in fertilization, development of gametes and embryos. Functional analysis by the Panther software identified 13 gene ontology biological processes significantly represented in this study such as reproduction, developmental process, cellular component organization or biogenesis, and immune system process, which plays relevant roles in swine reproductive traits.

conclusionOur research helps to improve the understanding of the genetic architecture of number of piglets born alive, given that the combination of GWAS and CNV analyses allows for a more efficient identification of the genomic regions and biological processes associated with this trait in Duroc pigs. Pig breeding programs could potentially benefit from a more accurate discovery of important genomic regions.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyAnimalsAnimals, NewbornChromosome MappingDNA Copy Number VariationsGenotypePhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LociSwineCNVComplex traitGWASSNP panelSus scrofa domesticus

Identifiers

PMID31029102
PMCPMC6487013
OpenAlexW2947502106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.