Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31029100›Full record

Observational studyBMC medical research methodology2019

Obstacles to recruitment in paediatric studies focusing on mental health in a physical health context: the experiences of clinical gatekeepers in an observational cohort study.

Maria E Loades, Lucie Smith, Nina Higson-Sweeney, Lucy Beasant, Paul Stallard, David Kessler, Esther Crawley

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC medical research methodology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maria E LoadesDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, England, UK. m.e.loades@bath.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0839-3190
Lucie SmithDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, England, UK.
Nina Higson-SweeneyDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, England, UK.
Lucy BeasantBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Paul StallardDepartment of Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
David KesslerBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Esther CrawleyBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
University of Bath · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBAt Bristol · GB

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2016-09-021Department of Health SRF-2013-06-013Medical Research Council MR/K025643/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies in both paediatric and psychiatric settings often experience problems in recruitment. This can compromise the ability of the study to recruit to target, meaning studies are potentially underpowered. It can also result in a biased sample if a non-representative group are selectively recruited. Recruitment to studies in health contexts often depends on healthcare professionals, who act as gatekeepers by screening patients for eligibility and obtaining consent for the research team to contact them. The experience of health professionals as gatekeepers in paediatric studies is poorly understood and may affect whether recruitment is successful or not.

methodsSix out of seven eligible healthcare professionals from a specialist paediatric chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) team were interviewed. All participants were undertaking initial clinical assessments within which they were asked to identify eligible patients for an observational study of co-morbid mental health problems in adolescents with confirmed CFS/ME. This study had experienced particular recruitment problems, more so than other studies in the same service. Interview questions were designed to explore perceptions of research, and barriers and facilitators of recruitment. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was used.

resultsParticipants espoused their commitment to the value of research. However, they perceived there to be a number of barriers to recruitment. Barriers within the clinical context included time pressures and the emotional nature of initial clinical assessments. Barriers posed by the wider research context included recruiting to multiple studies at the same time. Factors specific to the observational study of mental health in CFS/ME included aspects of the study design, such as the name and nature of the study, as well as the focus of the study itself. Participants made a number of recommendations about how recruitment barriers could be overcome.

conclusionsThe current study highlights the need to carefully consider, at design stage, how to overcome potential barriers to recruitment. Gatekeepers should be actively involved at this stage to ensure that the study is set up in such a way to best enable recruitment activities within the clinical setting.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionAdolescentChildCohort StudiesFatigue Syndrome, ChronicFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleMental HealthQualitative ResearchResearch DesignCFSCohort studyGatekeepingPaediatricRecruitment

Identifiers

PMID31029100
PMCPMC6487041
OpenAlexW2945039302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.