Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31029085›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2019

Topological and functional comparison of community detection algorithms in biological networks.

Sara Rahiminejad, Mano R Maurya, Shankar Subramaniam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Loss of long-range co-expression is a common feature in cancer.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Prediction of postoperative infections by strategic data imputation and explainable machine learning.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Network analysis of driver genes in human cancers.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sara RahiminejadDepartments of Bioengineering and Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.
Mano R MauryaDepartment of Bioengineering and San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA. mmaurya@ucsd.edu.
Shankar SubramaniamDepartment of Bioengineering, Departments of Computer Science and Engineering, Cellular and Molecular Medicine, and the Graduate Program in Bioinformatics, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA. shankar@ucsd.edu.

Funding

Systems Biological Analysis of Innate and Adaptive Responses to VaccinationU19AI090023 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI AHMED, RAFI, LI, SHUZHAO · 2010 to 2021
$45.0M
The second phase of NIH Common Fund 4D Nucleome Network Organizational HubU01CA200147 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ZHONG, SHENG · 2015 to 2024
$22.0M
Systems Biology Analyses for Hemodynamic Regulation of Vascular HomeostasisR01HL108735 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CHIEN, SHU, SHYY, JOHN YJ · 2012 to 2024
$13.4M
Shear Regulation of MicroRNA Transportomes and Targetomes in Vascular HomeostasisR01HL106579 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI CHIEN, SHU, SHYY, JOHN YJ · 2011 to 2022
$8.3M
The Metabolomics Data Center and Workbench (MDCW)U01DK097430 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SUBRAMANIAM, SHANKAR · 2012 to 2017
$7.4M
An Integrative Omics Approach to Identify Biomarkers Related to Preeclampsia and Breast Cancer RisksR01HD084633 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GARMIRE, LANA X · 2016 to 2020
$3.0M
Mapping Disease Pathways for Biliary AtresiaR01DK109365 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SHIN, DONGHUN, SINDHI, RAKESH K. · 2017 to 2020
$2.4M
Emory R38 Research Training ProgramR38AI140299 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI OFOTOKUN, IGHOVWERHA, ROUPHAEL, NADINE GEORGES · 2018 to 2021
$1.4M
Theoretical Foundations and Software Infrastructure for Biological Network DatabasesU01CA198941 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KOYUTURK, MEHMET · 2015 to 2017
$1.4M
Reconstruction and Modeling of Dynamical Molecular NetworksR01LM012595 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SUBRAMANIAM, SHANKAR · 2018 to 2021
$1.3M
National Science Foundation STC-0939370NCI NIH HHS U01 CA198941NCI NIH HHS U01 CA200147NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL106579NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL108735NIAID NIH HHS R38 AI140299NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI090023NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD084633NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK109365NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK097430NIH HHS U01 DK097430, U01 CA200147, U01 CA198941, U19 AI090023, R01 HL106579, R01HL108735, R01 HD084633, R01 DK109365, R01LM012595NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012595
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity detection algorithms are fundamental tools to uncover important features in networks. There are several studies focused on social networks but only a few deal with biological networks. Directly or indirectly, most of the methods maximize modularity, a measure of the density of links within communities as compared to links between communities.

resultsHere we analyze six different community detection algorithms, namely, Combo, Conclude, Fast Greedy, Leading Eigen, Louvain and Spinglass, on two important biological networks to find their communities and evaluate the results in terms of topological and functional features through Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway and Gene Ontology term enrichment analysis. At a high level, the main assessment criteria are 1) appropriate community size (neither too small nor too large), 2) representation within the community of only one or two broad biological functions, 3) most genes from the network belonging to a pathway should also belong to only one or two communities, and 4) performance speed. The first network in this study is a network of Protein-Protein Interactions (PPI) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Yeast) with 6532 nodes and 229,696 edges and the second is a network of PPI in Homo sapiens (Human) with 20,644 nodes and 241,008 edges. All six methods perform well, i.e., find reasonably sized and biologically interpretable communities, for the Yeast PPI network but the Conclude method does not find reasonably sized communities for the Human PPI network. Louvain method maximizes modularity by using an agglomerative approach, and is the fastest method for community detection. For the Yeast PPI network, the results of Spinglass method are most similar to the results of Louvain method with regard to the size of communities and core pathways they identify, whereas for the Human PPI network, Combo and Spinglass methods yield the most similar results, with Louvain being the next closest.

conclusionsFor Yeast and Human PPI networks, Louvain method is likely the best method to find communities in terms of detecting known core pathways in a reasonable time.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGene OntologyHumansMetabolic Networks and PathwaysProtein Interaction MapsProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsBiological functionBiological networksCommunity detectionModularityPathways

Identifiers

PMID31029085
PMCPMC6487005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.