Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31029077›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2019

Early consequences of allopolyploidy alter floral evolution in Nicotiana (Solanaceae).

Elizabeth W McCarthy, Jacob B Landis, Amelda Kurti, Amber J Lawhorn, Mark W Chase, Sandra Knapp, Steven C Le Comber, Andrew R Leitch, Amy Litt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Challenges and prospects for a potential allohexaploid Brassica crop.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2021
    Review
  6. Chromosome Evolution in the Family Solanaceae.Frontiers in plant science · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Elizabeth W McCarthyDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
Jacob B LandisDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
Amelda KurtiDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
Amber J LawhornDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA.
Mark W ChaseRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3DS, UK.
Sandra KnappNatural History Museum, London, SW7 5BD, UK.
Steven C Le ComberSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, UK.
Andrew R LeitchSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS, UK.
Amy LittDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA. amy.litt@ucr.edu.
University of California, Riverside · USQueen Mary University of London · GBCurtin University · AUNatural History Museum · GBSUNY Cortland · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolyploidy has played a major role in angiosperm evolution. Previous studies have examined polyploid phenotypes in comparison to their extant progenitors, but not in context of predicted progenitor phenotypes at allopolyploid origin. In addition, differences in the trends of polyploid versus diploid evolution have not been investigated. We use ancestral character-state reconstructions to estimate progenitor phenotype at allopolyploid origin to determine patterns of polyploid evolution leading to morphology of the extant species. We also compare trends in diploid versus allopolyploid evolution to determine if polyploidy modifies floral evolutionary patterns.

resultsPredicting the ancestral phenotype of a nascent allopolyploid from reconstructions of diploid phenotypes at the time of polyploid formation generates different phenotype predictions than when extant diploid phenotypes are used, the outcome of which can alter conclusions about polyploid evolution; however, most analyses yield the same results. Using ancestral reconstructions of diploid floral phenotypes indicate that young polyploids evolve shorter, wider corolla tubes, but older polyploids and diploids do not show any detectable evolutionary trends. Lability of the traits examined (floral shape, corolla tube length, and corolla tube width) differs across young and older polyploids and diploids. Corolla length is more evolutionarily labile in older polyploids and diploids. Polyploids do not display unique suites of floral characters based on both morphological and color traits, but some suites of characters may be evolving together and seem to have arisen multiple times within Nicotiana, perhaps due to the influence of pollinators.

conclusionsYoung polyploids display different trends in floral evolution (shorter, wider corolla tubes, which may result in more generalist pollination) than older polyploids and diploids, suggesting that patterns of divergence are impacted by the early consequences of allopolyploidy, perhaps arising from genomic shock and/or subsequent genome stabilization associated with diploidization. Convergent evolution in floral morphology and color in Nicotiana can be consistent with pollinator preferences, suggesting that pollinators may have shaped floral evolution in Nicotiana.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionPolyploidyDatabases, GeneticDiploidyFlowersPhenotypePhylogenySolanaceaeAncestral character state reconstructionEvolutionFlower colorFlower morphologyGeometric morphometricsHybridizationNicotianaPolyploidy

Identifiers

PMID31029077
PMCPMC6486959
OpenAlexW2947176468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.