ArticleNeurobiology of aging2019
Reductions in GABA following a tDCS-language intervention for primary progressive aphasia.
Article in Neurobiology of aging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in Frontotemporal Dementia: A Systematic Review of Non-Pharmacological Treatment Approaches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Biomarker use in predicting transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) response: a systematic scoping review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia with and Without Concomitant Speech and Language Therapy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Neuropsychology review · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Patients with Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Systematic Review and Updated Meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Pooled it
- Behavioral Treatment for Speech and Language in Primary Progressive Aphasia and Primary Progressive Apraxia of Speech: A Systematic Review.Neuropsychology review · 2024Pooled it
- Magnetic resonance spectroscopy with transcranial direct current stimulation to explore the underlying biochemical and physiological mechanism of the human brain: A systematic review.Human brain mapping · 2021Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia: Methodological Considerations.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Pooled it
- A multi-modal approach for the treatment of non-fluent/agrammatic variant of Primary Progressive Aphasia.Brain communications · 2025Trial
- Linking GABAergic and Dopaminergic Neurotransmission: Effects on Neural Activity During Human Speech Control.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- The Tip-of-the-Tongue Phenomenon: Cognitive, Neural, and Neurochemical Perspectives.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Non-invasive brain stimulation in frontotemporal dementia: syndrome-specific signals and priorities for future trials.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
- Efficacy of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia Treatment: A Review.Brain sciences · 2025Review
- The role of structural and functional parameters in designing pathology-specific tDCS protocols for primary progressive aphasia.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2025Article
- Protocol for a multisite study on the efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation as an adjuvant to naming and spelling therapy in the treatment of oral and written naming in individuals with primary progressive aphasia.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Letter to the Editor Response to: Is Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Really Beneficial for Frontotemporal Dementia? (Published 12-18-2024).Journal of central nervous system disease · 2025Article
- Home-Based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Primary Progressive Aphasia: A Pilot Study.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Impact of acquisition and modeling parameters on the test-retest reproducibility of edited GABA.NMR in biomedicine · 2024Article
- A Critical Review of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation Technologies in Alzheimer's Dementia and Primary Progressive Aphasia.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2024Review
- Frontotemporal lobar degeneration.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2023Review
- Continuous Automated Analysis Workflow for MRS Studies.Journal of medical systems · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has shown efficacy in augmenting the effects of language therapy in primary progressive aphasia (PPA). The mechanism of action of tDCS is not understood, but preliminary work in healthy adults suggests it modulates γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) levels to create an environment optimal for learning. It is unknown if this proposed mechanism translates to aging or neurodegenerative conditions. This study tested the hypothesis that tDCS reduces GABA at the stimulated tissue in PPA. We applied GABA-edited magnetic resonance spectroscopy to quantify GABA levels before and after a sham-controlled tDCS intervention with language therapy in PPA. All participants showed improvements but those receiving active tDCS showed significantly greater language improvements compared to sham both immediately after the intervention and at 2-month follow-up. GABA levels in the targeted tissue decreased from baseline after the intervention and remained decreased 2 months after the intervention. This work supports the hypothesis that tDCS modulates GABAergic inhibition to augment learning and is clinically useful for PPA combined with language therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.