Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31028948›Full record

ArticleHealth & place2019

A scoping review of simulation modeling in built environment and physical activity research: Current status, gaps, and future directions for improving translation.

Leah Frerichs, Natalie R Smith, Kristen Hassmiller Lich, Todd K BenDor, Kelly R Evenson

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Health & place, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Biochemical and Physiological Effects of Galanin in Health and Disease.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Review
  3. Causal Loop Diagrams of Food Systems, Diet, and Obesity: A Scoping Review of Methods, Contextual Factors, and Outcomes.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Article
  4. Simulated retail food environments: A literature review of systems science approaches to advance equity in access to healthy diets.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Leah FrerichsDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Electronic address: leahf@unc.edu.
Natalie R SmithDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Kristen Hassmiller LichDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Todd K BenDorDepartment of City and Regional Planning, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Kelly R EvensonDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Hazel B Nichols · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
Identifying and Disentangling Social and Physical Environmental Effects on Physical Activity in Diverse Adolescent and Young Adult PopulationsK01HL138159 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI FRERICHS, LEAH M. · 2017 to 2021
$780k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL138159NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing reviews have suggested that simulation studies of physical activity and environments are an emerging area, but none have explored findings in this area systematically. We used a scoping review framework to assess the use of simulation modeling to inform decision-making about built environment influences on physical activity. A systematic literature search was conducted in multiple databases in January 2018. Sixteen articles met the inclusion criteria. The studies evaluated interventions and features that were related to neighborhood safety (crime or traffic), active transportation, land use design, and walking and biking infrastructure. All of the studies focused on urban areas and most considered heterogeneity of outcomes based on local context. The majority of studies (70%) did not appear to have engaged or been used by practitioners or policy-makers to inform real-world decisions. There has been a growth of simulation modeling studies, but there remain gaps. The studies evaluated built environment interventions that have been recommended by expert panels, but more were of interventions related to active transportation; few considered recommended interventions to support recreational activity. Furthermore, studies have all focused on urban settings and there is a need to consider non-urban settings and how heterogeneity could reduce or exacerbate health disparities. More work to involve and evaluate practices for engaging stakeholders in model development and interpretation is also needed to overcome the translation of simulation research to practice gap, and realize its potential impact on the built environment and physical activity.

Indexed as

Built EnvironmentComputer SimulationExerciseSafetyTransportationBicyclingDecision MakingHumansResidence CharacteristicsUrban PopulationWalkingDecision makingEnvironment designSimulationTransportation

Identifiers

PMID31028948
PMCPMC6589124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.