ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2019
Learning using privileged information improves neuroimaging-based CAD of Alzheimer's disease: a comparative study.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Diagnostic Approaches for Alzheimer's Disease: From Biomarkers to Deep Learning Technology.CNS & neurological disorders drug targets · 2025Review
- Increasing efficiency of SVMp+ for handling missing values in healthcare prediction.PLOS digital health · 2023Article
- Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis Diagnosis Using Privileged Learning of Protein Markers.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2021Article
- An Effective Multimodal Image Fusion Method Using MRI and PET for Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis.Frontiers in digital health · 2021Article
- A Survey on Deep Learning for Neuroimaging-Based Brain Disorder Analysis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The neuroimaging-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) for Alzheimer's disease (AD) has shown its effectiveness in recent years. In general, the multimodal neuroimaging-based CAD always outperforms the approaches based on a single modality. However, single-modal neuroimaging is more favored in clinical practice for diagnosis due to the limitations of imaging devices, especially in rural hospitals. Learning using privileged information (LUPI) is a new learning paradigm that adopts additional privileged information (PI) modality to help to train a more effective learning model during the training stage, but PI itself is not available in the testing stage. Since PI is generally related to the training samples, it is then transferred to the learned model. In this work, a LUPI-based CAD framework for AD is proposed. It can flexibly perform a classifier- or feature-level LUPI, in which the information is transferred from the additional PI modality to the diagnosis modality. A thorough comparison has been made among three classifier-level algorithms and five feature-level LUPI algorithms. The experimental results on the ADNI dataset show that all classifier-level and deep learning based feature-level LUPI algorithms can improve the performance of a single-modal neuroimaging-based CAD for AD by transferring PI. Graphical abstract Graphical abstract for the framework of the LUPI-based CAD for AD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31028606What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.