Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31028547›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2020

Comparison of enhanced laparoscopic imaging techniques in endometriosis surgery: a diagnostic accuracy study.

Marit C I Lier, Stijn L Vlek, Marjolein Ankersmit, Peter M van de Ven, Judith J M L Dekker, Maaike C G Bleeker, Velja Mijatovic, Jurriaan B Tuynman

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Marit C I LierDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Endometriosis Center, Amsterdam UMC-Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Stijn L VlekDepartment of Surgery, Endometriosis Center, Amsterdam UMC-Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1118, ZH7F20, 1081HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. s.vlek@vumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-8614-0626
Marjolein AnkersmitDepartment of Surgery, Endometriosis Center, Amsterdam UMC-Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1118, ZH7F20, 1081HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Peter M van de VenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC-Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Judith J M L DekkerDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Endometriosis Center, Amsterdam UMC-Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maaike C G BleekerDepartment of Pathology, Endometriosis Center, Amsterdam UMC-Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Velja MijatovicDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Endometriosis Center, Amsterdam UMC-Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jurriaan B TuynmanDepartment of Surgery, Endometriosis Center, Amsterdam UMC-Location VUmc, De Boelelaan 1118, ZH7F20, 1081HZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Endometriosis · GBAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor surgical endometriosis, treatment key is to properly identify the peritoneal lesions. The aim of this clinical study was to investigate if advanced imaging improves the detection rate by comparing narrow-band imaging (NBI), near-infrared imaging with indocyanine green (NIR-ICG), or three-dimensional white-light imaging (3D), to conventional two-dimensional white-light imaging (2D) for the detection of peritoneal endometriotic lesions.

methodsThis study was a prospective, single-center, randomized within-subject, clinical trial. The trial was conducted at Amsterdam UMC-Location VUmc, a tertiary referral hospital for endometriosis. 20 patients with ASRM stage III-IV endometriosis, scheduled for elective laparoscopic treatment of their endometriosis, were included. During laparoscopy, the pelvic region was systematically inspected with conventional 2D white-light imaging followed by inspection with NBI, NIR-ICG, and 3D imaging in a randomized order. Suspected endometriotic lesions and control biopsies of presumably healthy peritoneum were taken for histological examination. The pathologist was blinded for the method of laparoscopic detection. Sensitivity and specificity rates of the enhanced imaging techniques were analyzed. McNemar's test was used to compare sensitivity to 2D white-light imaging and Method of Tango to assess non-inferiority of specificity.

resultsIn total, 180 biopsies were taken (117 biopsies from lesions suspected for endometriosis; 63 control biopsies). 3D showed a significantly improved sensitivity rate (83.5% vs. 75.8%, p = 0.016) and a non-inferior specificity rate (82.4% vs. 84.7%, p = 0.009) when compared to 2D white-light imaging. The single use of NBI or NIR-ICG showed no improvement in the detection of endometriosis. Combining the results of 3D and NBI resulted in a sensitivity rate of 91.2% (p < 0.001).

conclusionEnhanced laparoscopic imaging with 3D white light, combined with NBI, improves the detection rate of peritoneal endometriosis when compared to conventional 2D white-light imaging. The use of these imaging techniques enables a more complete laparoscopic resection of endometriosis.

Indexed as

EndometriosisLaparoscopyNarrow Band ImagingPeritoneumSpectroscopy, Near-InfraredAdultColoring AgentsFemaleHumansImage EnhancementImaging, Three-DimensionalIndocyanine GreenMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityColoring AgentsIndocyanine Green3DEndometriosisFluorescenceImaging techniquesLaparoscopyNBI

Identifiers

PMID31028547
PMCPMC6946762
OpenAlexW2941236639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.