Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31028540›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2019

The efficacy of a coordinated pharmacological blockade in glioblastoma stem cells with nine repurposed drugs using the CUSP9 strategy.

Erlend Skaga, Ida Ø Skaga, Zanina Grieg, Cecilie J Sandberg, Iver A Langmoen, Einar O Vik-Mo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Updates in IDH-Wildtype Glioblastoma.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erlend SkagaVilhelm Magnus Laboratory, Institute for Surgical Research and Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4950, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway. erlend.skaga@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3942-3492
Ida Ø SkagaVilhelm Magnus Laboratory, Institute for Surgical Research and Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4950, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Zanina GriegVilhelm Magnus Laboratory, Institute for Surgical Research and Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4950, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Cecilie J SandbergVilhelm Magnus Laboratory, Institute for Surgical Research and Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4950, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Iver A LangmoenVilhelm Magnus Laboratory, Institute for Surgical Research and Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4950, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Einar O Vik-MoVilhelm Magnus Laboratory, Institute for Surgical Research and Department of Neurosurgery, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4950, Nydalen, 0424, Oslo, Norway.
Oslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

Kreftforeningen (NO) 144402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeConstructed from a theoretical framework, the coordinated undermining of survival paths in glioblastoma (GBM) is a combination of nine drugs approved for non-oncological indications (CUSP9; aprepitant, auranofin, captopril, celecoxib, disulfiram, itraconazole, minocycline, quetiapine, and sertraline) combined with temozolomide (TMZ). The availability of these drugs outside of specialized treatment centers has led patients to embark on combination treatments without systematic follow-up. However, no experimental data on efficacy using the CUSP9 strategy in GBM have been reported.

methodsUsing patient-derived glioblastoma stem cell (GSC) cultures from 15 GBM patients, we described stem cell properties of individual cultures, determined the dose-response relationships of the drugs in the CUSP9, and assessed the efficacy the CUSP9 combination with TMZ in concentrations clinically achievable. The efficacy was evaluated by cell viability, cytotoxicity, and sphere-forming assays in both primary and recurrent GSC cultures.

resultsWe found that CUSP9 with TMZ induced a combination effect compared to the drugs individually (p < 0.0001). Evaluated by cell viability and cytotoxicity, 50% of the GSC cultures displayed a high sensitivity to the drug combination. In clinical plasma concentrations, the effect of the CUSP9 with TMZ was superior to TMZ monotherapy (p < 0.001). The Wnt-signaling pathway has been shown important in GSC, and CUSP9 significantly reduces Wnt-activity.

conclusionsAdding experimental data to the theoretical rationale of CUSP9, our results demonstrate that the CUSP9 treatment strategy can induce a combination effect in both treatment-naïve and pretreated GSC cultures; however, predicting response in individual cultures will require further profiling of GSCs.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsAprepitantAuranofinBrain NeoplasmsCaptoprilCelecoxibDisulfiramDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorFemaleGlioblastomaHumansItraconazoleMiceMice, SCIDAprepitantAuranofinCaptoprilCelecoxibDisulfiramItraconazoleMinocyclineQuetiapine FumarateSertralineTemozolomideCUSP9GlioblastomaGlioblastoma stem cellsRepurposed drugsTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID31028540
PMCPMC6527541
OpenAlexW2942340216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.