ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2019
IQN path ASBL report from the first European cfDNA consensus meeting: expert opinion on the minimal requirements for clinical ctDNA testing.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liquid biopsy in malignant primary bone tumors: Clinical applications of circulating tumor DNA and circulating tumor cells for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment monitoring (Review).Oncology reports · 2026Review
- Article
- Fostering the implementation of liquid biopsy in clinical practice: meeting report 2024 of the European Liquid Biopsy Society (ELBS).Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025Article
- Article
- Implementation of circulating tumour DNA multi-target mutation testing in plasma: a perspective from an external quality assessment providers' survey.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2024Article
- Diagnostic value of liquid biopsy in the era of precision medicine: 10 years of clinical evidence in cancer.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2023Review
- Circulating tumor DNA in Hodgkin lymphoma.Annals of hematology · 2022Review
- Results of a worldwide external quality assessment of cfDNA testing in lung Cancer.BMC cancer · 2022Article
- Recommendations for a practical implementation of circulating tumor DNA mutation testing in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer.ESMO open · 2022Review
- A clinician's handbook for using ctDNA throughout the patient journey.Molecular cancer · 2022Review
- Liquid Biopsy Using Cell-Free or Circulating Tumor DNA in the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Cellular and molecular gastroenterology and hepatology · 2022Review
- Towards Routine Implementation of Liquid Biopsies in Cancer Management: It Is Always Too Early, until Suddenly It Is Too Late.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Mass Spectrometry as a Highly Sensitive Method for Specific Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis in NSCLC: A Comparison Study.Cancers · 2020Article
- Clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA as a response and follow-up marker in cancer therapy.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2020Review
- External Quality Assurance of Current Technology for the Testing of Cancer-Associated Circulating Free DNA Variants.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2020Article
- Technical Evaluation of Commercial Mutation Analysis Platforms and Reference Materials for Liquid Biopsy Profiling.Cancers · 2020Article
- Comparison of Circulating Cell-Free DNA Extraction Methods for Downstream Analysis in Cancer Patients.Cancers · 2020Article
- Current Trends in Applications of Circulatory Microchimerism Detection in Transplantation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019Review
- Implementation of Novel Molecular Biomarkers for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in the Netherlands: How to Deal With Increasing Complexity.Frontiers in oncology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liquid biopsy testing is a new laboratory-based method that detects tumour mutations in circulating free DNA (cfDNA) derived from minimally invasive blood sampling techniques. Recognising the significance for clinical testing, in 2017, IQN Path provided external quality assessment for liquid biopsy testing. Representatives of those participating laboratories were invited to attend a workshop to discuss the findings and how to achieve quality implementation of cfDNA testing in the clinical setting, the discussion and outcomes of this consensus meeting are described below. Predictive molecular profiling using tumour tissue in order to select cancer patients eligible for targeted therapy is now routine in diagnostic pathology. If insufficient tumour tissue material is available, in some circumstances, recent European Medicines Agency (EMA) guidance recommends mutation testing with plasma cfDNA. Clinical applications of cfDNA include treatment selection based on clinically relevant mutations derived from pre-treatment samples and the detection of resistant mutations upon progression of the disease. In order to identify tumour-related mutations in amongst other nucleic acid material found in plasma samples, highly sensitive laboratory methods are needed. In the workshop, we discussed the variable approaches taken with regard to cfDNA extraction methods, the tests, and considered the impact of false-negative test results. We explored the lack of standardisation of complex testing procedures ranging from plasma collection, transport, processing and storage, cfDNA extraction, and mutation analysis, to interpretation and reporting of results. We will also address the current status of clinical validation and clinical utility, and its use in current diagnosis. This workshop revealed a need for guidelines on with standardised procedures for clinical cfDNA testing and reporting, and a requirement for cfDNA-based external quality assessment programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.