Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31028530›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2019

Ultrasound optic nerve sheath diameter evaluation in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic pelvic surgery.

Maddalena De Bernardo, Livio Vitiello, Nicola Rosa

Abstract readLetter
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Optic Nerve Ultrasound Evaluation in Children: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Smokers' Choroidal Changes.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022
    Article
  12. Effect of Percutaneous Tracheostomy on Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter (TONS Trial).Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maddalena De BernardoDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, Via S Allende, 84081, Baronissi, Salerno, Italy. mdebernardo@unisa.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4566-0064
Livio VitielloDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, Via S Allende, 84081, Baronissi, Salerno, Italy.
Nicola RosaDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, Via S Allende, 84081, Baronissi, Salerno, Italy.
University of Salerno · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Following the interesting reading of the article "A randomised trial to compare the increase in intracranial pressure as correlated with the optic nerve sheath diameter during propofol versus sevoflurane-maintained anesthesia in robot-assisted laparoscopic pelvic surgery", the authors comment some aspects about ocular ultrasonography to measure optic nerve sheath diameter as a tool to detect potential intracranial hypertension, pointing out the utility of Standardized A Scan technique for this purpose.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresAnesthesiaAnestheticsHumansIntracranial HypertensionIntracranial PressureIntraoperative ComplicationsOptic NervePelvisPropofolSevofluraneUltrasonographyAnestheticsPropofolSevofluraneBlooming effectIntracranial pressureOptic nerve sheath diameterUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID31028530
OpenAlexW2942439018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.