Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31028509›Full record

ReviewThe Psychiatric quarterly2019

Folie du système? Preventing Violence Against Nurses in In-patient Psychiatry.

Vashti L S Campbell, Holly L Foley, Kevin W Vianna, Fern Brunger

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vashti L S CampbellFaculty of Medicine, Division of Community Health and Humanities, Memorial University, 300 Prince Philip Drive, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada.
Holly L FoleyFaculty of Medicine, Division of Community Health and Humanities, Memorial University, 300 Prince Philip Drive, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada.
Kevin W ViannaFaculty of Medicine, Division of Community Health and Humanities, Memorial University, 300 Prince Philip Drive, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada.
Fern BrungerFaculty of Medicine, Division of Community Health and Humanities, Memorial University, 300 Prince Philip Drive, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada. fbrunger@mun.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Violence against psychiatric nurses is a difficult reality of work on in-patient psychiatry units. Health care providers and managers, nursing unions, and workplace protection agencies are looking for solutions to improve safety and quality of care. We are suggesting that simultaneous to this solution-seeking, there is also a need to critically reflect on the nature of violence itself within in-patient psychiatric settings. In this article we consider the gendered dynamics of power and violence within the in-patient psychiatric setting. The nursing profession is over 90% female. Given that violence in society often has a 'gendered' nature, and in light of a report from the Ontario Council of Hospital Unions which likened violence against nurses to domestic violence, we have put forth a view of the acute in-patient psychiatric milieu that considers gender and power in its analysis of violence against nurses. Intended to encourage enquiry into our pre-suppositions as health care providers, we use Foucauldian and feminist theories to up-end our notions of "anti-violence technologies", and to consider the unique and risky position that psychiatric nurses occupy as carers, care providers, and "anti-violence officers". We conclude by posing ethical questions which may be of interest for professional development, care planning, team building, and clinical ethics and education.

Indexed as

InpatientsNurse-Patient RelationsNursing Staff, HospitalPsychiatric Department, HospitalPsychiatric NursingAdultFemaleHumansMaleWorkplace ViolenceEthics, clinicalEthics, professionalInpatientsMeSHOrganization and administrationPsychiatryViolence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.