Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31028506›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2019

Establishment and validation of a novel survival prediction scoring algorithm for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer spinal metastasis.

Shizhao Zang, Qin He, Qiyuan Bao, Yuhui Shen, Weibin Zhang

Registry-linked trialAbstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03363685 (An Observational Study of Novel Survival Prediction Algorithm as Clinical Decision Support for Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03363685 unknown statusnot on this map

An Observational Study of Novel Survival Prediction Algorithm as Clinical Decision Support for Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Spinal Metastasis

TypeobservationalSponsorRuijin HospitalRan2017 to 2022Enrolled140ConditionsSpinal Metastases, Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The role of surgery in the treatment of metastatic bone tumor.International journal of clinical oncology · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shizhao ZangDepartment of Orthopedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197 Ruijin er Road, Shanghai, China.
Qin HeDepartment of Orthopedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197 Ruijin er Road, Shanghai, China.
Qiyuan BaoDepartment of Orthopedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197 Ruijin er Road, Shanghai, China.
Yuhui ShenDepartment of Orthopedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197 Ruijin er Road, Shanghai, China. yuhuiss@163.com.
Weibin ZhangDepartment of Orthopedics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No. 197 Ruijin er Road, Shanghai, China. zhangweibin10368@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study was to develop an algorithm capable of predicting the survival of patients with NSCLC spinal metastasis for individualized therapy.

methodsWe identified 176 consecutive patients with NSCLC spinal metastasis between 2006 and 2017. Twenty-four features, including age, gender, smoking, KPS, paralysis, histological subtype, tumor stage, surgery, EGFR status, CEA, CA125, CA19-9, NSE, SCC, CYFRA21-1, calcium, AKP, albumin, the number of spinal, extra-spinal bone and visceral metastasis, time to metastasis, pathological fracture, and primary or secondary metastasis, were retrospectively analyzed. Features associated with survival in the multivariate analyses were included in a scoring model, which was prospectively validated in another 63 patients (NCT03363685).

resultsThe median follow-up period was 12.00 months (interquartile range 6.00-23.40 months). One hundred forty-seven patients died during follow-up, with a median survival of 13.6 months being observed. Multivariate analysis revealed that the following features were associated with survival: age, smoking, CA125, SCC, KPS, and EGFR status. A scoring system based on these features was created to stratify patients into low-risk (0-3), intermediate-risk (4-6) and high-risk (7-10) groups, whose estimated median survival times 29.10, 10.40 and 3.90 months, respectively. The Harrell's c-index was 0.72. Model validation supported this model's validity and reproducibility.

conclusionsIn patients with NSCLC spinal metastasis, survival was associated with age, smoking, CA125, SCC, KPS, and EGFR status. A validated scoring system based on these features was devised that can predict the survival times of those patients. This scoring system provides a basis for applying the NOMS framework and for facilitating individual treatment.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAgedAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenCA-19-9 AntigenCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungErbB ReceptorsFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateKeratin-19Lung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate Analysisantigen CYFRA21.1Antigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenCA-19-9 AntigenEGFR protein, humanErbB ReceptorsKeratin-19Non-small-cell lung cancer metastaticSpinal metastasisSurvival prediction algorithm

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.