Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31028475›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2020

Real-world clinical experience with the percutaneous extracorporeal life support system: Results from the German Lifebridge

Maryna Masyuk, Peter Abel, Martin Hug, Bernhard Wernly, Assad Haneya, Stefan Sack, Konstantinos Sideris, Nicolas Langwieser, Tobias Graf, Georg Fuernau and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Maryna MasyukDivision of Cardiology, Pulmonary Diseases and Vascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Peter AbelDivision of Cardiology, Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine B, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Martin HugDepartment of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Internal Intensive Care Medicine, Städtisches Klinikum München GmbH, Klinikum Neuperlach, Munich, Germany.
Bernhard WernlyDepartment of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4024-0220
Assad HaneyaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Schleswig, Holstein Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Stefan SackDepartment of Cardiology, Pneumology, and Internal Intensive Care Medicine, Schwabing Hospital, Academic Municipal Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Konstantinos SiderisDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, German Heart Center, Technische Universität München (TUM), Munich, Germany.
Nicolas LangwieserMedical Clinic I, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Tobias GrafDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Medical Clinic II, University Heart Center Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Georg FuernauDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Medical Clinic II, University Heart Center Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Marcus FranzDepartment of Cardiology, Clinic of Internal Medicine I, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany.
Ralf WestenfeldDivision of Cardiology, Pulmonary Diseases and Vascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Malte KelmDivision of Cardiology, Pulmonary Diseases and Vascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Stephan B FelixDivision of Cardiology, Pneumology and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine B, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Christian JungDivision of Cardiology, Pulmonary Diseases and Vascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany. christian.jung@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
Düsseldorf University Hospital · DEUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DEChristian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DEDeutsches Herzzentrum München · DEJena University Hospital · DEMünchen Klinik · DEMünchen Klinik Schwabing · DEParacelsus Medical University · ATTUM Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe concept of percutaneous extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is based on immediate cardiovascular stabilization allowing for sufficient end-organ perfusion, thus improving the outcome in patients with circulatory arrest. Lifebridge

methodsA total of 60 tertiary cardiovascular centers were interrogated with regard to application and short-term results after use of Lifebridge ECLS system. Detailed data were collected by standardized case report forms in all centers consented to participate in the study. Demographic and clinical baseline characteristics of the patient population, procedural and follow-up data were recorded and analyzed.

resultsIn total, 444 patients were analyzed regarding mortality. The detailed study cohort consisted of 112 patients. A total of 80% of the study subjects represented patients post cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 43% were in cardiogenic shock and 50% suffered from acute myocardial infarction. The survival rates were 36% immediately after device implementation and 16% after 30 days. Multivariable analysis revealed that only serum lactate concentration at admission could be proven as independent predictor of patients' outcome. Patients with lactate concentrations above 10 mmol/L exhibited > 95% mortality (p < 0.05 versus below 10 mmol/L).

conclusionThe present study provides real-world clinical data of patients treated with a transportable automated ECLS system. In conclusion, Lifebridge is a safely applicable cardiorespiratory stabilization tool associated with acceptable complication rates. Nevertheless, mortality rates were high in these critically ill patients, especially in those showing high lactate concentrations at admission.

Indexed as

AgedCardiopulmonary ResuscitationCohort StudiesCritical IllnessExtracorporeal Membrane OxygenationFemaleGermanyHeart ArrestHumansLactic AcidMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionRegistriesRetrospective StudiesShock, CardiogenicLactic AcidCardiac arrestCardiogenic shockECLSExtracorporeal life supportMechanical circulatory support

Identifiers

PMID31028475
OpenAlexW2942411661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.