ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2019
[ANCA-associated vasculitides : State of the art].
Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- [High burden of disease in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis : A claims data study in Germany].Der Internist · 2022Review
- Onset of granulomatosis with polyangiitis obscured by heart disease in an elderly man.Radiology case reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA, formerly Wegener's granulomatosis) and microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) are associated with the detection of antibodies against neutrophilic cytoplasmic antigens (ANCA) and are referred to as ANCA-associated vasculitides (AAV). In the event of the clinical suspicion of AAV the ANCA should first be determined by means of an antigen-specific immunoassay for proteinase 3‑ANCA and myeloperoxidase-ANCA, according to current consensus recommendations. The diagnosis of AAV should also be confirmed by biopsy if possible. The classification criteria for AAV are currently being revised. Diagnostic criteria do not exist. The standard induction therapy consists of rituximab or cyclophosphamide, each in combination with glucocorticoids (GC). In the absence of severe organ involvement, methotrexate can alternatively be used. Recent study data suggest that additive plasmapheresis does not improve the long-term outcome. After remission, remission-preserving treatment with azathioprine, methotrexate or rituximab should be given for at least 48 months. The risk of severe infections is markedly increased, especially during the remission induction phase but can also be reduced during treatment with rituximab by the prophylactic administration of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. In view of the increased risk of infection, GC-reduced or GC-free treatment regimens are currently the focus of clinical development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.