ArticleEuropean radiology2019
Prediction of response after chemoradiation for esophageal cancer using a combination of dosimetry and CT radiomics.
Article in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning applications in predicting pharmacological treatment outcomes and responses in esophageal cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Radiomics and artificial intelligence-based prediction of tumor response in digestive system neoplasm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- CT-based radiomics for predicting lymph node metastasis in esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- Performance of radiomics-based artificial intelligence systems in the diagnosis and prediction of treatment response and survival in esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2023Pooled it
- Methodological quality of machine learning-based quantitative imaging analysis studies in esophageal cancer: a systematic review of clinical outcome prediction after concurrent chemoradiotherapy.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Pooled it
- Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence-Centred Systems in the Diagnosis and Postoperative Surveillance of Upper Gastrointestinal Malignancies Using Computed Tomography Imaging: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy.Annals of surgical oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Prediction of distant metastasis in esophageal cancer using a radiomics-clinical model.European journal of medical research · 2022Trial
- Radiomics model for preoperative prediction of 3-year survival-based CT image biomarkers in esophageal cancer.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022Trial
- A Clinical-Radiomics Nomogram Based on Pretreatment Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicting Tumor Residual at the End of Radiotherapy in Patients With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.International journal of biomedical imaging · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis and Management of Cancers: Potentials and Challenges.MedComm · 2025Review
- Development and validation a radiomics combined clinical model predicts treatment response for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Multi-modal radiomics features to predict overall survival of locally advanced esophageal cancer after definitive chemoradiotherapy.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- The application of artificial intelligence in upper gastrointestinal cancers.Journal of the National Cancer Center · 2025Review
- Current Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Esophageal Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Radiomics model building from multiparametric MRI to predict Ki-67 expression in patients with primary central nervous system lymphomas: a multicenter study.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Article
- Prognostic factors in locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a clinical and radiomic analysis of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy before surgery.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Machine learning modeling of cancer treatment-related cardiac events in breast cancer: utilizing dosiomics and radiomics.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Pairwise machine learning-based automatic diagnostic platform utilizing CT images and clinical information for predicting radiotherapy locoregional recurrence in elderly esophageal cancer patients.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2024Article
- A predictive model based on radiomics, clinical features, and pathologic indicators for disease-free survival after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a 7-year retrospective study.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the treatment response prediction feasibility and accuracy of an integrated model combining computed tomography (CT) radiomic features and dosimetric parameters for patients with esophageal cancer (EC) who underwent concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) using machine learning.
methodsThe radiomic features and dosimetric parameters of 94 EC patients were extracted and modeled using Support Vector Classification (SVM) and Extreme Gradient Boosting algorithm (XGBoost). The 94-sample dataset was randomly divided into a 70-sample training subset and a 24-sample independent test set while keeping the class proportions intact via stratification. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to assess the performance of models using radiomic features alone and using combined radiomic features and dosimetric parameters.
resultsA total of 42 radiomic features and 18 dosimetric parameters plus the patients' characteristic parameters were extracted for these 94 cases (58 responders and 36 non-responders). XGBoost plus principal component analysis (PCA) achieved an accuracy and area under the curve of 0.708 and 0.541, respectively, for models with radiomic features combined with dosimetric parameters, and 0.689 and 0.479, respectively, for radiomic features alone. Image features of GlobalMean X.333.1, Coarseness, Skewness, and GlobalStd contributed most to the model. The dosimetric parameters of gross tumor volume (GTV) homogeneity index (HI), Cord Dmax, Prescription dose, Heart-Dmean, and Heart-V50 also had a strong contribution to the model.
conclusionsThe model with radiomic features combined with dosimetric parameters is promising and outperforms that with radiomic features alone in predicting the treatment response of patients with EC who underwent CRT. KEY POINTS: • The model with radiomic features combined with dosimetric parameters is promising in predicting the treatment response of patients with EC who underwent CRT. • The model with radiomic features combined with dosimetric parameters (prediction accuracy of 0.708 and AUC of 0.689) outperforms that with radiomic features alone (best prediction accuracy of 0.625 and AUC of 0.412). • The image features of GlobalMean X.333.1, Coarseness, Skewness, and GlobalStd contributed most to the treatment response prediction model. The dosimetric parameters of GTV HI, Cord Dmax, Prescription dose, Heart-Dmean, and Heart-V50 also had a strong contribution to the model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.