Observational studyEuropean radiology2019
Tumour necrosis as assessed with
Observational study in European radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- MRI characteristics of appendicular soft tissue lymphoma: a retrospective analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Clinicopathological analysis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma lacking surface immunoglobulin light chain restriction on flow cytometry.Journal of clinical and experimental hematopathology : JCEH · 2022Article
- An incidental finding behind adrenal incidentaloma.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism case reports · 2022Article
- CT-based radiomics model with machine learning for predicting primary treatment failure in diffuse large B-cell Lymphoma.Translational oncology · 2021Article
- Multiple metabolic parameters and visual assessment ofAbdominal radiology (New York) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesMYC gene rearrangements in diffuse large B cell lymphomas (DLBCLs) result in high proliferation rates and are associated with a poor prognosis. Strong proliferation is associated with high metabolic demand and tumour necrosis. The aim of this study was to investigate differences in the presence of necrosis and semiquantitative
methodsFluorescence in situ hybridisation analysis for MYC rearrangements, visual assesment, semiquantitative analysis of
resultsOf 61 tumours, 21 (34%) had a MYC rearrangement (MYC
conclusionsMYC rearrangements in DLBCL have no influence on the visual parameter necrosis KEY POINTS: • Retrospective analysis indicates that MYC rearrangement is not associated with necrosis on
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.