Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31028419›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2019

Pelvic organ prolapse patients' attitudes and preferences regarding their uterus: comparing German- and Russian-speaking women.

Polina Lyatoshinsky, Christian Fünfgeld, Alexander Popov, Vitaly Bezhenar, Viktoria Krutova, Daniela Ulrich, Wolfgang Umek

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Polina LyatoshinskyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. polina.lyatoshinsky@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6991-0411
Christian FünfgeldTettnang Hospital, Tettnang, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Alexander PopovMoscow Regional Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moscow, Russia.
Vitaly BezhenarPavlov State Medical University, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Viktoria KrutovaKuban State Medical University, Krasnodar, Russia.
Daniela UlrichDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Wolfgang UmekDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThe aim of this study was to compare preferences of patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) regarding their uterus between German- and Russian-speaking areas.

methodsSix urogynecologic tertiary referral centers participated in this prospective study: three centers from German-speaking countries and three from different regions of Russia. To assess the uterus-related preferences as well as the attitude toward hysterectomy versus uterus-sparing prolapse surgery, we developed a structured questionnaire that included 5-point Likert scales related to benefit of uterus (BOU) and benefit of not having uterus (BNU). Each scale consisted of 12 items (range of possible scores: 12-60). Finally, patients were asked if they preferred uterus removal or preservation when undergoing prolapse surgery.

resultsOne hundred and seventy-eight German-speaking and 206 Russian-speaking patients were included in the study. There was no significant difference in patients' preference before undergoing POP surgery regarding uterus preservation versus hysterectomy between German- and Russian-speaking patients: 40% of German-speaking and 54% of Russian-speaking patients preferred to retain their uterus before undergoing POP surgery. Comparison of BOU mean scores showed a significant difference between groups: 20.6 ± 6.7 for German-speaking compared with 32.5 ± 9.1 for Russian-speaking patients (p < 0.01). The Russian-speaking group had significantly higher mean scores on domains sexuality, body image, and partnership of the BOU scale (2.6 ± 1.0 vs. 1.8 ± 0.9 for sexuality; 2.4 ± 1.1 vs. 1.5 ± 0.7 for body image, and 2.6 ± 0.9 vs. 1.6 ± 0.7 for partnership domains; p < 0.05).

conclusionsAlthough a large proportion of German- and Russian-speaking patients prefers uterus preservation when undergoing prolapse surgery, the uterus was more important for sexuality, partnership, and body image in Russian-speaking patients.

Indexed as

Patient PreferenceAdultAttitude to HealthBody ImageCross-Cultural ComparisonFemaleGermanyHumansHysterectomyLanguageMiddle AgedOrgan Sparing TreatmentsPelvic Organ ProlapseProspective StudiesRussiaSexual BehaviorAttitudePelvic organ prolapsePreferenceUterus scoreUterus-sparing prolapse surgery

Identifiers

PMID31028419
PMCPMC6861192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.