Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31028413›Full record

ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2019

Stability and bifurcation analysis of a ratio-dependent community dynamics model on Batesian mimicry.

Hayato Kato, Takenori Takada

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hayato KatoGraduate School of Environmental Science, Hokkaido University, Kita-10, Nishi-5, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-810, Japan. haya10kato@gmail.com.
Takenori TakadaFaculty of Environmental Earth Science, Hokkaido University, Kita-10, Nishi-5, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-810, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP15H04418Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP26291087
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Batesian mimicry is the similarity of coloration and patterns in an unpalatable species (the "model-species") and a palatable species (the "mimic-species"). The resemblance is advantageous for the mimic-species because the mimic-species can deceive predators and avoid predation. While Batesian mimicry is an important subject in ecology as a general phenomenon in nature, previous theoretical studies focus mainly on the evolution of mimicry and the predator learning process. In these mathematical models, the population sizes of the model- and mimic-species are not considered explicitly or are assumed to be constant, but this is not plausible in model-mimic community dynamics. Thus, the model-mimic community has been paid relatively less attention; However, to elucidate problems on Batesian mimicry, it is essential to understand the fundamental characteristics of the model-mimic community dynamics. Here, we construct a basic model-mimic community dynamics model, obtain the existence and stability conditions of its equilibria, and conduct the bifurcation analysis and numerical calculation. The results show that the instability of the model-only population is predicted, and this is consistent with the typical pattern of geographical distribution in Batesian mimicry in the field. We propose three new hypotheses to explain the typical pattern of geographical distribution. Furthermore, we reveal an irreversibility regarding the model-mimic coexistence that is important for the conservation of the model- and mimic-species.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionBiological MimicryModels, BiologicalPredatory BehaviorAnimalsComputer SimulationPopulation DynamicsIrreversibilityPitchfork bifurcationRatio-dependent predator–prey systemTranscritical bifurcation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.