ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2019
Incidence and distribution of UroSEEK gene panel in a multi-institutional cohort of bladder urothelial carcinoma.
Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and Broad Application of a Double Drop-Off ddPCR Assay for Simultaneous Detection of FourCancers · 2026Article
- Review
- Diagnostic Performance and Clinical Utility of the UromonitorDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The Diagnostic Performance of a Four-Gene Digital Droplet PCR Panel for Urine Liquid Biopsy in Urothelial Bladder Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Review
- Unleashing the power of urine‑based biomarkers in diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring of bladder cancer (Review).International journal of oncology · 2025Review
- Precision Medicine in Cytopathology.Surgical pathology clinics · 2024Review
- Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase-Promoter Mutation in Young Patients with Bladder Tumors.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Article
- Urine biomarkers in bladder cancer - current status and future perspectives.Nature reviews. Urology · 2023Review
- Circulating and urinary tumour DNA in urothelial carcinoma - upper tract, lower tract and metastatic disease.Nature reviews. Urology · 2023Review
- Development of a Sensitive Digital Droplet PCR Screening Assay for the Detection ofBiomedicines · 2023Article
- An Association Study of Germline Variants in Bladder Cancer-Related Genes with the Prognosis of Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Article
- Comparison of molecular profiles of upper tract urothelial carcinomaTranslational andrology and urology · 2022Review
- Review
- [Diagnostic and predictive markers in urinary tract cytology].Der Pathologe · 2022Review
- Article
- Molecular Pathology of Urothelial Carcinoma.Surgical pathology clinics · 2021Review
- Trends in urine biomarker discovery for urothelial bladder cancer: DNA, RNA, or protein?Translational andrology and urology · 2021Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
16 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Noninvasive approaches for early detection of bladder cancer are actively being investigated. We recently developed a urine- based molecular assay for the detection and surveillance of bladder neoplasms (UroSEEK). UroSEEK is designed to detect alterations in 11 genes that include most common genetic alterations in bladder cancer. In this study, we analyzed 527 cases, including 373 noninvasive and 154 invasive urothelial carcinomas of bladder from transurethral resections or cystectomies performed at four institutions (1991-2016). Two different mutational analysis assays of a representative tumor area were performed: first, a singleplex PCR assay for evaluation of the TERT promoter region (TERTSeqS) and second, a multiplex PCR assay using primers designed to amplify regions of interest of 10 (FGFR3, PIK3CA, TP53, HRAS, KRAS, ERBB2, CDKN2A, MET, MLL, and VHL) genes (UroSeqS). Overall, 92% of all bladder tumors were positive for at least one genetic alteration in the UroSEEK panel. We found TERT promoter mutations in 77% of low-grade noninvasive papillary carcinomas, with a relatively lower incidence of 65% in high-grade noninvasive papillary carcinomas and carcinomas in situ; p = 0.017. Seventy-two percent of pT1 and 63% of muscle-invasive bladder tumors harbored TERT promoter mutations with g.1295228C>T alteration being the most common in all groups. FGFR3 and PIK3CA mutations were more frequent in low-grade noninvasive papillary carcinomas compared with high-grade noninvasive papillary carcinomas and carcinomas in situ (p < 0.0001), while the opposite was true for TP53 (p < 0.0001). Significantly higher rates of TP53 and CDKN2A mutation rates (p = 0.005 and 0.035, respectively) were encountered in muscle-invasive bladder tumors compared with those of pT1 stage. The overwhelming majority of all investigated tumors showed at least one mutation among UroSEEK assay genes, confirming the comprehensive coverage of the panel and supporting its potential utility as a noninvasive urine-based assay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.