Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31028363›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2019

Incidence and distribution of UroSEEK gene panel in a multi-institutional cohort of bladder urothelial carcinoma.

Marie-Lisa Eich, Maria Del Carmen Rodriguez Pena, Simeon U Springer, Diana Taheri, Aline C Tregnago, Daniela C Salles, Stephania Martins Bezerra, Isabela W Cunha, Kazutoshi Fujita, Dilek Ertoy and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Precision Medicine in Cytopathology.Surgical pathology clinics · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Molecular Pathology of Urothelial Carcinoma.Surgical pathology clinics · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Marie-Lisa EichDepartment of Pathology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Maria Del Carmen Rodriguez PenaDepartment of Pathology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Simeon U SpringerHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Ludwig Cancer for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Diana TaheriDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Aline C TregnagoDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Daniela C SallesDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Stephania Martins BezerraDepartment of Pathology, AC Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Isabela W CunhaDepartment of Pathology, AC Camargo Cancer Center, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2029-5139
Kazutoshi FujitaDepartment of Urology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan.
Dilek ErtoyDepartment of Pathology, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Trinity J BivalacquaDepartment of Urology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Cristian TomasettiDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Nickolas PapadopoulosHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Ludwig Cancer for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ken W KinzlerHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Ludwig Cancer for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Bert VogelsteinHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Ludwig Cancer for Cancer Genetics and Therapeutics, Baltimore, MD, USA.
George J NettoDepartment of Pathology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA. gnetto@uabmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3915-9134
Howard Hughes Medical Institute · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USAC Camargo Hospital · BRHacettepe University · TRIsfahan University of Medical Sciences · IRThe University of Osaka · JP

Funding

Translational Research Central ServicesP30CA006973 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Rosalie Wollett · 1985 to 2026
$208.6M
Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Douglas Yee · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007309 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI COX, ANDREA L · 1985 to 2019
$43.2M
New biomonitoring methodologies to measure DNA adducts in human tissuesR01ES019564 · NIEHS · WADSWORTH CENTER · PI TURESKY, ROBERT J. · 2011 to 2020
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006973NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES019564NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Noninvasive approaches for early detection of bladder cancer are actively being investigated. We recently developed a urine- based molecular assay for the detection and surveillance of bladder neoplasms (UroSEEK). UroSEEK is designed to detect alterations in 11 genes that include most common genetic alterations in bladder cancer. In this study, we analyzed 527 cases, including 373 noninvasive and 154 invasive urothelial carcinomas of bladder from transurethral resections or cystectomies performed at four institutions (1991-2016). Two different mutational analysis assays of a representative tumor area were performed: first, a singleplex PCR assay for evaluation of the TERT promoter region (TERTSeqS) and second, a multiplex PCR assay using primers designed to amplify regions of interest of 10 (FGFR3, PIK3CA, TP53, HRAS, KRAS, ERBB2, CDKN2A, MET, MLL, and VHL) genes (UroSeqS). Overall, 92% of all bladder tumors were positive for at least one genetic alteration in the UroSEEK panel. We found TERT promoter mutations in 77% of low-grade noninvasive papillary carcinomas, with a relatively lower incidence of 65% in high-grade noninvasive papillary carcinomas and carcinomas in situ; p = 0.017. Seventy-two percent of pT1 and 63% of muscle-invasive bladder tumors harbored TERT promoter mutations with g.1295228C>T alteration being the most common in all groups. FGFR3 and PIK3CA mutations were more frequent in low-grade noninvasive papillary carcinomas compared with high-grade noninvasive papillary carcinomas and carcinomas in situ (p < 0.0001), while the opposite was true for TP53 (p < 0.0001). Significantly higher rates of TP53 and CDKN2A mutation rates (p = 0.005 and 0.035, respectively) were encountered in muscle-invasive bladder tumors compared with those of pT1 stage. The overwhelming majority of all investigated tumors showed at least one mutation among UroSEEK assay genes, confirming the comprehensive coverage of the panel and supporting its potential utility as a noninvasive urine-based assay.

Indexed as

MutationPromoter Regions, GeneticAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Transitional CellDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutation RateUrinary BladderUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID31028363
PMCPMC6872189
OpenAlexW2941777273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.