Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31028362›Full record

ReviewModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2019

An update on the morphology and molecular pathology of serrated colorectal polyps and associated carcinomas.

Rish K Pai, Mark Bettington, Amitabh Srivastava, Christophe Rosty

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Association BetweenFrontiers in medicine · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rish K PaiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, 85259, USA. pai.rish@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2692-221X
Mark BettingtonFaculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Amitabh SrivastavaDepartment of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Christophe RostyFaculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia. c.rosty@uq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7671-2651
The University of Queensland · AUBrigham and Women's Hospital · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our understanding of serrated colorectal polyps has increased dramatically over the past two decades and has led to a modern classification scheme for these lesions. Sessile serrated polyps with dysplasia represent the most clinically significant serrated polyp; however, the morphologic heterogeneity of dysplasia in sessile serrated polyps has only recently been recognized and correlated with MLH1 immunohistochemistry. Detailed morphologic analysis of traditional serrated adenomas has led to the recognition of flat and early forms of this polyp. Robust data on the risk of metachronous lesions in patients with serrated polyps are also beginning to emerge. This review will summarize our current understanding of serrated polyps and associated carcinomas with a focus on diagnostic criteria, morphologic heterogeneity, molecular findings, and natural history. Controversial issues in the diagnosis and classification of these polyps are also discussed.

Indexed as

AdenomaColonic PolypsColorectal NeoplasmsHumansImmunohistochemistryMutL Protein Homolog 1Pathology, MolecularMutL Protein Homolog 1

Identifiers

PMID31028362
OpenAlexW2940760861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.