Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31028218›Full record

ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)

Definitive Radiotherapy for Older Patients Aged ≥75 Years With Localized Esophageal Cancer.

Gen Suzuki, Hideya Yamazaki, Norihiro Aibe, Koji Masui, Takuya Kimoto, Daisuke Shimizu, Takeshi Nishimura, Akihiro Nakashima, Kazutaka Machida, Kanako Kawabata and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Radiotherapy combined with nimotuzumab for elderly esophageal cancer patients: A phase II clinical trial.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Gen SuzukiDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan gensuzu@koto.kpu-m.ac.jp.
Hideya YamazakiDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Norihiro AibeDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Koji MasuiDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Takuya KimotoDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Daisuke ShimizuDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Takeshi NishimuraDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Akihiro NakashimaDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Kazutaka MachidaDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Kanako KawabataDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Yoshiaki OtaDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Hitoshi FujiwaraDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Takeshi IshikawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Kei YamadaDepartment of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimTo evaluate the predictive factors in older patients with localized esophageal cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients aged ≥75 years who were treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy between 2008 and 2017. The patients were classified into the oldest-old group (≥80 years) and the old group (75-79 years).

resultsFifty patients were identified, 28 in the oldest-old group and 22 in the old group. Forty-six patients (92%) completed the planned radiotherapy. The median follow-up time was 21 months. Two-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival, and locoregional control rates were 53%, 42%, and 51%, respectively. Univariate analyses for OS showed that neither the radiotherapy field nor total radiotherapy dose was a significant factor. Clinical T stage, clinical N stage, and age were independent predictors of OS.

conclusionAge ≥80 years is an independent prognostic factor for OS. Elective nodal irradiation and total radiotherapy dose above 50.4 Gy did not improve survival. Our findings may help in the treatment decisions for localized esophageal cancer in older patients.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCombined Modality TherapyEsophageal NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMedication AdherenceNeoplasm StagingRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedSurvival AnalysisTreatment Outcomechemoradiationelective nodal irradiationEsophageal cancerinvolved field radiation therapyolder patientsradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID31028218
PMCPMC6559920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.