Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31028129›Full record

ReviewNeurology2019

A brief history of "Alzheimer disease": Multiple meanings separated by a common name.

David S Knopman, Ronald C Petersen, Clifford R Jack

Abstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. New criteria to predict LATE-NC in the clinical setting: Probable/Possible LATE and LANS.Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Amyloid PET disclosure in subjective cognitive decline: Patient experiences over time.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David S KnopmanFrom the Departments of Neurology (D.S.K., R.C.P.) and Radiology (C.R.J.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN. knopman@mayo.edu.
Ronald C PetersenFrom the Departments of Neurology (D.S.K., R.C.P.) and Radiology (C.R.J.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Clifford R JackFrom the Departments of Neurology (D.S.K., R.C.P.) and Radiology (C.R.J.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Funding

SUPPLEMENT TO ALZHEIMERS DISEASE PATIENT REGISTRYU01AG006786 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI GRAFF-RADFORD, JONATHAN, JACK, CLIFFORD R. · 1986 to 2023
$49.6M
THE PGRN/TDP-43 AXIS IN ALZHEIMER?S DISEASE AND NEURODEGENERATIONP50AG016574 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PETERSEN, RONALD C · 1999 to 2018
$36.9M
PREDICTING ALZHEIMERS DISEASE WITH MAGNETIC RESONANCER01AG011378 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI JACK, CLIFFORD R. · 1993 to 2017
$12.1M
Rochester Epidemiology ProjectR01AG034676 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ROCCA, WALTER A, ST SAUVER, JENNIFER LYNN · 2010 to 2019
$9.5M
Disease pathways in the population determined by amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration imaging biomarkersR37AG011378 · NIA · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI CLIFFORD R. JACK · 2018 to 2026
$6.8M
NIA NIH HHS P50 AG016574NIA NIH HHS R01 AG011378NIA NIH HHS R01 AG034676NIA NIH HHS R37 AG011378NIA NIH HHS U01 AG006786
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The field of Alzheimer disease (AD) has a nosologic problem: The diagnostic label "Alzheimer disease" has several distinctive meanings. The term probable AD was introduced in 1984 to designate a clinically diagnosed acquired and progressive amnestic dementia for which there was no evidence for another etiology. Probable AD represented a clinicopathologic entity that assumed a specific and sensitive linkage between amnestic dementia and the neuropathology of β-amyloid-containing neuritic plaques and tau-containing neurofibrillary tangles. The clinicopathologic model represented by probable AD was adapted in abbreviated form for population-based studies and general clinical practice, although the uncertainty connoted by "probable" was often overlooked. Representing the growing public awareness of later life cognitive impairment, a vernacular meaning of AD arose out of the clinicopathologic model in which AD represented all dementia not due to another clinically apparent cause. In contrast, by the 1990s, neuropathologists settled on a definition of AD based entirely on a sufficient burden of neuritic plaques and neurofibrillary tangles at postmortem examination, regardless of antemortem clinical status. In the last decade, the availability of fluid and imaging biomarkers that measure β-amyloid and tau abnormalities has enabled antemortem pathobiological diagnoses, highlighting the divide between the clinicopathologic model, the vernacular usage, and the pathobiological models. Each definition has value. However, the meanings of AD as defined by each of these models are not interchangeable. The pathobiological one is the only one that is unambiguous.

Indexed as

Terminology as TopicAlzheimer DiseaseHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumans

Identifiers

PMID31028129
PMCPMC6556090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.