Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31028037›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Rotavirus vaccine impact assessment surveillance in India: protocol and methods.

Nayana P Nair, Samarasimha Reddy N, Sidhartha Giri, Venkata Raghava Mohan, Umesh Parashar, Jacqueline Tate, Minesh Pradyuman Shah, Rashmi Arora, Mohan Gupte, Sanjay M Mehendale and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Rotavirus vaccines: progress and new developments.Expert opinion on biological therapy · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nayana P NairDepartment of GI Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Samarasimha Reddy NDepartment of GI Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Sidhartha GiriDepartment of GI Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Venkata Raghava MohanDepartment of Community Health, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Umesh ParasharCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jacqueline TateCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Minesh Pradyuman ShahCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Rashmi AroraIndian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Mohan GupteIndian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Sanjay M MehendaleIndian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi, India.
Investigators of the Rotavirus vaccine Impact Surveillance Network
Gagandeep KangDepartment of GI Sciences, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Christian Medical College & Hospital · INCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USIndian Council of Medical Research · INNational Institute of Epidemiology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRotavirus infection accounts for 39% of under-five diarrhoeal deaths globally and 22% of these deaths occur in India. Introduction of rotavirus vaccine in a national immunisation programme is considered to be the most effective intervention in preventing severe rotavirus disease. In 2016, India introduced an indigenous rotavirus vaccine (Rotavac) into the Universal Immunisation Programme in a phased manner. This paper describes the protocol for surveillance to monitor the performance of rotavirus vaccine following its introduction into the routine childhood immunisation programme.

methodsAn active surveillance system was established to identify acute gastroenteritis cases among children less than 5 years of age. For all children enrolled at sentinel sites, case reporting forms are completed and a copy of vaccination record and a stool specimen obtained. The forms and specimens are sent to the referral laboratory for data entry, analysis, testing and storage. Data from sentinel sites in states that have introduced rotavirus vaccine into their routine immunisation schedule will be used to determine rotavirus vaccine impact and effectiveness. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Institutional Review Board of Christian Medical College, Vellore, and all the site institutional ethics committees approved the project. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and with stakeholders of the universal immunisation programme in India.

Indexed as

Immunization ProgramsChild, PreschoolDiarrheaFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansIndiaInfantInfant, NewbornMaleProgram EvaluationRotavirusRotavirus InfectionsRotavirus VaccinesSentinel SurveillanceVaccinationRotavirus VaccinesimpactIndiarotavirussurveillancevaccine

Identifiers

PMID31028037
PMCPMC6502045
OpenAlexW2941456875

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.