ArticleJournal of optometry
Normative values of visual evoked potentials in Northeastern of Iran.
Article in Journal of optometry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Physiological determinants of cortical P100 responses in pattern visual evoked potentials: a scoping review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- Changes in Visual Evoked Potential and Optical Coherence Tomography in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Parkinson's disease · 2025Review
- ISCEV standard pattern reversal VEP development: paediatric reference limits from 649 healthy subjects.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Comparison of CRT and LCD monitors for objective estimation of visual acuity using the sweep VEP.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Effect of Induced Myopia on the Vestibulo-ocular Reflex Evaluated by Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential.Journal of ophthalmic & vision researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeVisual evoked potentials (VEPs) provide important diagnostic information related to the functional integrity of the visual pathways. The aim of this study was to establish normative values of different components of pattern reversal VEPs on Iranian normal adult subjects.
methodsMonocular and binocular pattern reversal VEPs were recorded on 59 healthy participants (22.55±3.79 years old) using the Roland RETI system for two check sizes of 15 and 60min of arc. The measured VEP components were the latencies of N75, P100, N135 and amplitude of N75-P100.
resultsRepeated measures ANOVA showed that viewing eye condition has a significant impact on the amplitude of N75-P100 (P<0.001, F=13.89). Also, the effect of check size on the latencies of N75, P100, N135, amplitude of N75-P100 (P≤0.010), as well as the intraocular difference of P100 latency and amplitude N75-P100 (P=0.007) was significant. More specifically, the amplitude of N75-P100 in both check sizes significantly differed between gender groups (P<0.023).
conclusionAccording to the results of this study, VEPs components are affected by the stimulus size, monocular and binocular recording conditions and gender. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the normative values of VEPs in each population, so that the results could be used in clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.